The seventillion bajillion JO Nationals competitors are trampling Fort Worth like a herd of bison this weekend. Juniors and seniors in groups A, B, and C compete Saturday, while groups D, E, and F compete Sunday. Those senior D, E, and Fers are the most relevant for upcoming NCAA purposes, but there are developments worth storing in the memory bank nearly all around.
Full results can be found at the new-ish MyUSAGym scoring app, but I’ll put the significant results, along with my notes about them here.
Senior F – Top 10 AA & Notables
Rk | Name | NCAA | VT | UB | BB | FX | Total |
1 | Maddie Karr | Denver 2017 | 9.875 (1) | 9.700 (1) | 9.775 (1) | 9.675 (2) | 39.025 |
This is the main reason I’ve remained high on Denver’s future postseason chances even post-McGee, because Karr is perhaps the top JO gymnast in this recruiting class. She won the Nastia last year, and now she’s a JO nastional champion who recorded the highest score of any gymnast in any session, junior or senior. She’s expected to be a top AAer next season who should deliver the replacement scores Denver desperately needs. | |||||||
2 | Cassidy Keelen | Cal 2017 | 9.675 (3) | 9.500 (14) | 9.750 (3) | 9.650 (4) | 38.575 |
Denver and Cal were the two significant “the status quo is dead, long live the status quo” teams last season, so it’s particularly encouraging that their incoming gymnasts are placing so well at JO Nationals, giving credence to the hope that they will at least remain competitive, if not improve in coming seasons. Cal returns all 24 postseason routines from 2016 and now will be able to add a gymnast like Keelen to bolster those lineups. | |||||||
3 | Rachel Dickson | Georgia 2017 | 9.625 (4) | 9.700 (1) | 9.700 (4) | 9.450 (18) | 38.475 |
Georgia has a monumental routine-replacement task in front of it next season, and part of the concern about relying on Sabrina Vega to do the heavy lifting next year is…how much is she…gymnastics…anymore? It will take several villages to replace their two (or three) best routines on each event, and this result helps prove that Dickson can be at least one of those villages. More than anything else, it will be L10s like Dickson, Schick, Marino, and Cherrey who will dictate who kind of team Georgia becomes in 2017. | |||||||
4 | Christina Berg | Arizona 2017 | 9.525 (14) | 9.625 (5) | 9.525 (15) | 9.575 (6) | 38.250 |
I’m pleased to see how many future Arizona gymnasts have placed well in this competition, and how many top-10 floor placements they’ve brought with them. Arizona’s performance last season was largely par for the course and not different enough from what was happening before, though that is natural in the first year of a new dynasty. Tabitha’s era will be defined by the next couple seasons and what she is able to get out of these new gymnasts. | |||||||
5 | Madison Osman | Michigan 2017 | 9.500 (16) | 9.550 (10) | 9.500 (18) | 9.675 (2) | 38.225 |
Michigan’s incoming class is laregely a bars and beam group, which is fine because they’ll still have Artz, Chiarelli, and Karas to do the major lifting in the power department, but Osman could be an essential piece as the gymnast in the 2017 class who brings a high-level, likely floor routine. | |||||||
6 | Katie Becker | Auburn 2017 | 9.575 (9) | 9.550 (10) | 9.550 (10) | 9.500 (13) | 38.175 |
We know that Auburn’s incoming class brings a number of solid gymnasts, and these 9.5s for a sixth-place finish are reflective of that and of a gymnast who can certainly contribute to lineups. The question we won’t really have an answer to until next January is where the team stands without Atkinson. Will they feel the lack of the big star, or will these solid JO gymnasts do a Captain Planet “by your powers combined” to render the sailing as smooth as it can be? | |||||||
7 | Evanni Roberson | Washington 2017 | 9.400 (27) | 9.700 (1) | 9.550 (10) | 9.450 (18) | 38.100 |
Vaulters, I said! We need VAULTERS! Still, Washington had a very nice 2016 season and a somewhat unexpected resurgance for a program that had been getting a little too 7th-in-the-Pac-12 lately. The judges at regionals thought Washington’s bars rotation was garbage, which is why the Huskies were not able to challenge a fall from UCLA, so someone who wins bars at JOs is more than welcome. Washington is losing the signifciance of Northey, but just Northey, so if Copiak and gymnasts like Roberson deliver, there’s still reason to hope for continued improvement next year. | |||||||
7 | Isabella Amado | Boise State 2017 | 9.600 (6) | 9.575 (7) | 9.375 (26) | 9.550 (7) | 38.100 |
Boise State is really becoming the international house of gymnastics these days, with Collantes contributing an essential AA already and now Amado, who competes internationally for Panama, and Courtney McGregor joining for next season. We know BSU has great bars, but at regionals, Boise State ultimately proved not as competitive on vault and floor as it would have seemed based on the season’s results, who makes Amado’s solid finishes enticing. | |||||||
7 | Olivia Aepli | Ohio State 2017 | 9.425 (22) | 9.600 (6) | 9.575 (9) | 9.500 (13) | 38.100 |
Ohio State hasn’t really been the same since the previous Aepli’s class left, so while it may just be nominative nostalgia since Victoria Aepli was on the OSU team that made nationals, we’ll take what we can get at this point. That 6th-place finish does seem to indiciate that bars routines run in the family. | |||||||
10 | Melissa Brooker | NC State 2017 | 9.475 (21) | 9.575 (7) | 9.425 (21) | 9.550 (7) | 38.025 |
While NC State hasn’t had a ton of high AA placements in this event, a number of the incoming gymnasts have managed top-10 finishes here and there on events, including Alexis Beucler of “hi, your nickname is also a homophobic slur” fame, who finished 13th here. NC State is brining in a class of usabel AAers with a notably competitive event or two. | |||||||
11 | Michaela Burton | Arkansas 2017 | 9.425 (22) | 9.350 (20) | 9.700 (4) | 9.525 (11) | 38.000 |
You broke the Arkansas bars streak! But I had a narrative going! A narrative! | |||||||
12 | Chloe Cluchey | WVU 2017 | 9.600 (6) | 9.300 (22) | 9.625 (6) | 9.225 (32) | 37.750 |
17 | Aspen Tucker | Missouri 2017 | 9.625 (4) | 8.750 (43) | 9.625 (6) | 9.550 (7) | 37.550 |
It was almost a good meet, and then it went very, very wrong. Still, she would have been top-5 with a hit bars, and Missouri is another program dropping very little after last season that looks to continue improving with an infusion of yet more competitive L10s. | |||||||
27 | Elle Golison | Utah State 2017 | 9.750 (2) | 8.700 (44) | 8.875 (42) | 9.625 (5) | 36.950 |
N/A | Wynter Childers | Alabama 2017 | 9.600 (6) | 0.000 (-) | 9.775 (1) | 9.700 (1) | N/A |
Did something happen, or did she just pass bars? Because I thought she was going to win this session. She’ll be yet another significant gain for an Alabama team that keeps being almost good enough. |