A. Qualified
Following American Classic, our list of senior gymnasts currently qualified to nationals has grown longer.
Morgan Hurd – 2017 worlds team member
Ragan Smith – 2017 worlds team member
Jade Carey – 2017 worlds team member
Ashton Locklear – 2017 worlds team member – OUT
Jordan Chiles – 2017 worlds team alternate
Margzetta Frazier – February verification
Grace McCallum – February verification
Maile O’Keefe – 2018 American Cup
Trinity Thomas – 2018 Tokyo World Cup
Gabby Perea – April verification
Adeline Kenlin – April verification (2 events – UB/BB)
Alyona Shchennikova – April verification
Shilese Jones – American Classic
Shania Adams – American Classic
Madeleine Johnston – American Classic
Kara Eaker – American Classic
Madelyn Williams – American Classic (3 events – VT/UB/BB)
Audrey Davis – American Classic (2 events – VT/UB)
Riley McCusker – American Classic (2 events – UB/BB)
We’ll see Biles and Malabuyo at US Classic (and obviously any petitions they might need after that point will be granted). Plus, there are others in the mix like Olivia Dunne, whom we expect to add her name to this list at Classic or through petition, so it should be a pretty hearty field. Last quad, the senior fields at nationals got too small and exclusive (13 people in 2013 and 2014), so I’m pleased to see we’ll be back over 20 competitors this year.
The currently qualified juniors are
Kayla DiCello – February verification
Sunisa Lee – April verification
Jordan Bowers – April verification
Sydney Barros – April verification
JaFree Scott – April verification
Leanne Wong – April verification
Lilly Lippeatt – April verification
Tori Tatum – Junior Pan Ams
Konnor McClain – American Classic
Skye Blakely – American Classic
Olivia Greaves – American Classic
Ui Soma – American Classic
Aleah Finnegan – American Classic
Levi Jung-Ruivivar – American Classic
Sydney Morris – American Classic
Ciena Alipio – American Classic
Karis German – American Classic
Zoe Gravier – American Classic
B. Men’s National Qualifier
On Saturday, the US men will compete in their own version of the American Classic at the OTC—except there has been not a whisper of streaming or anything…because men’s. You’ve all opted out of the stream, and you didn’t have a choice.
Come on, guys. Grab a phone, make like a Russian, and instagram it or something.
Several of the big names will be competing—Mikulak, Penev, and Whittenburg—though all three have already qualified to nationals by virtue of being on the national team. Penev and Whittenburg have both been out with injury this year, so putting up scored routines here is a critical benchmark for them heading toward nationals and heading toward a worlds selection process where their overlapping FX/VT strengths will probably pit them head-to-head for a spot.
Keep an eye on…your local carrier pigeon or something…for results from this one.
Juniors compete at 12:30 MT and seniors at 6:00 MT, and you can check out the start list here.
C. Valeri in Brazil
Well well well well well well well well. Valeri Liukin led a national team camp in Brazil this month, his second time doing so this year. A guest-coaching stint may just be all this is (there has been no official announcement that he’s taking over or doing anything permanent), but Brazil does have a history of hiring Russian expats to lead the women’s program.
If you’re Brazil…I guess go for it? While Valeri’s distressing Atler-Ohashi past with relation to unhealthy weight and body-image coaching practices made him an untenable choice for the US right now, I also don’t believe it is “you can never coach anyone ever again!” disqualifying. If it were, the US national coaching staff would be an instant ghost town because that kind of BS used to be the norm. A simple public recognition of past mistakes might have been sufficient, expressing a commitment to creating a healthier atmosphere moving forward and learning how to coach fitness and weight properly. And if I’m the leadership of the Brazilian program, that’s still what I’m looking for before he could take over. It’s not a lot to ask.
D. Athlete Task Force
Remember that time Kerry Perry went to Congress two months ago and was like, “The Athlete Task Force is a thing!” but it definitely wasn’t? Well…it’s now a thing.
An Athlete Task Force is a nice idea if it has any actual influence on policy, but…come on. Unfortunately, our experience with USAG (and every other organization that has ever pretended, “We want you to have a voice!”) tells us this announcement will prove mere lip service to the ambiguous idea of ATHLETE EMPOWERMENT, a cynical attempt to be seen doing something that looks not-terrible. The ham-fisted way this was rolled out doesn’t exactly bode well.
Note that the duties of the Athlete Task Force outlined in the announcement are all crazy vague. You guys, they’re doing “key athlete-focused initiatives for the organization.” Oh those. You know, the initiatives. Very specific. Thank you.
The expected reality is that the Athlete Task Force will meet once in a blue moon, say good things publicly, and have no actual decision-making powers or influence at all as its recommendations are placed directly into that shredder-shaped filing cabinet under the desk.
Also, Ivana Hong and Steve Legendre are already the athlete reps on the board of directors. Shouldn’t they already have a voice? How is this different? Wasn’t this an opportunity to give more athletes input into the process? (If that’s what you actually want, which it isn’t.)
The first time a member of this task force publicly states a disagreement with USAG policy or a criticism of something USAG has done (without being quietly and immediately removed from the task force), then I’ll start to listen, but until then, I’m not optimistic that this is anything more than PR.
E. More terrible
As if the litany of injuries currently facing the top European contenders were not enough, Zsofia Kovacs of Hungary is now injured as well and will have to miss Euros.
Kovacs remains the leader of the Hungarian team, and her absence is as devastating to Hungary’s prospects as Steingruber’s absence is to Switzerland’s. While Hungary has other up-and-comers like new seniors Feher and Peter (and exciting junior Bianka Schermann, who will be senior next year), the program is still all about Kovacs to a large degree. Hungary making the team final in 2016 was a big deal, but it’s hard to envision a repeat now.
This does take away any of the controversy regarding Hungarian team selection now, as the team of Feher, Peter, Devai, Böczögö, and Makra is the aggressively obvious choice. Still not a bad group.
F. Mersin Challenge Cup
A brief check-in with the ignored step-sister of the Challenge Cup circuit, Mersin, which I haven’t talked about at all yet because it was not well-attended on the women’s side (the field lacked enough bars routines even to make up a full final).
But, we did see the return of Dipa Karmakar to competition with a handspring lay 1/1 and a Tsuk 2/1 that were difficult enough and landed-upright enough to win the vault title in a walk. Stay with those. Work on them. Don’t do a Prod. Those vaults, even with those landings, would be at least in contention to make a worlds vault final.
Otherwise, Turkey had a good meet, cruising to gold and silver on the other three events, and taking three of the six gold medals on the men’s side. Little Rhys Back Garden also successfully endured all of his dramas to win the title on PH.
G. GymCastic
This week, we have a commissioned episode on our favorite floor routines EVAH! If you think I wasn’t going to include those crazy Romanian ones from the 70s along with all of the actually good routines, then you don’t know me at all.
Enjoy!
I thought the 3-event cut for nationals was 39.0 – if true, that would mean Audrey Davis actually qualified on VT, UB, & FX (3-event total of 39.45: 13.3, 13.7, 12.45).
That is correct.
But I believe she is going AA at US Classic to try to qualify as an AAer.
The three event cut-off is 39.75. Spencer had it correct in his Things are Happening from a couple weeks ago but incorrect in the American Classic preview. Mistakes happen.
Thanks – gotcha. I figured it was something like that.
And if the cut for 2 events was 26.5 – Emily Lee had 13.4 on VT, 13.1 on FX to just make the cut.
So I am confused.
Simone Biles said she would be doing 2 events at the US Classic.
However, you cannot compete at Nationals in the AA unless you have qualified through the AA.
If this is the case, that would mean Simone cannot compete AA at Nationals.
Is she intending on petitioning to Nationals by way of competing at the US Classic on a few events?
I said the same thing about Biles a couple weeks ago. Presumably the only way she can compete is with a petition. I’m in favor of her being allowed to compete but I feel bad for all the people who had petitions denied in the past. And I feel like there should perhaps be some defined criteria for someone like Biles to go through to Nationals rather than someone making a decision because they like Biles and in the past they didn’t want to let someone else go through.
I guess she would have to petition technically, but she’s also Simone Biles sooo…
I mean, if you are an Olympic medalist, especially a golden one, you should be automatically qualified to any and every National Championship going forward. It isn’t like this kind of deal would hurt USAG as they have had several years where there was only 12-14 seniors competing and they all weren’t doing the AA either. It would benefit them, publicity wise, to have their Olympians competing at Nationals.
I can’t reply directly to the two posts I want to, but two thoughts – in response to Rich’s comment above about allowing Olympic medalists to go directly to Nationals, I agree. But if so, that should be a clear and established criterion in advance. We have had Olympic medalists denied trips to Nationals (Chellsie Memmel, Dominique Moceanu) and I think they were probably nowhere near where Simone is at in her training but if it’s the criteria, it should be consistent. Or if it’s only individual Olympic medalists, then make that the rule. But make it clear and consistent rather than arbitrary which is what we have now.
In response to Robin’s comment, I am not criticizing Simone or her plan nor do I see anyone else doing so. I perfectly understand why she wants to do so and I think her plan is solid. I am criticizing USAG and their lack of transparency, as usual, for how and why Simone is (I assume) going to be qualified for the all-around at Nationals in spite of having not met any official criteria. If she is getting to go based on her past achievements, there should be something written in the rules that she gets to go based on her past achievements.
I don’t see why she can’t just do AA anyway. if she’s as good as she says she is, she could just do an FTY vault, and then do like a full in, double layout, 1.5+punch front and double twist on floor and probably qualify AA. She doesn’t need to do any serious difficulty on the leg events.
I don’t think she can even do a FTY on VT LOLLLL
But you know how it goes, if Biles shows up to do AA when she isn’t 100% yet the gymnastics World will turn on her and claim she isn’t the same Simone we saw in Rio. Blah Blah.
This is her first competition in almost two years. I imagine part of the choice to start with two events has to do with easing herself into the mental aspect of competition. She’s getting her toes wet here. Simone has always had a smart plan. I don’t see any need to question how she designs her return.
It is insane that the athlete task force has reps from the board of directors. That is a direct conflict of interest. (The task force reports to USAG leadership which reports to the Board…? An independent board member should not also report to the USAG leadership.) At most, if they wanted to include the athlete reps on the board, they should have ex officio status and other athletes should have been chosen.
My guess: other athletes didn’t want to touch this with a 10-ft pole.
Or that they don’t have enough money to pay others so therefore they multi-task the roles out.
All the athlete reps, across all categories, are volunteer positions. The entire Board of Directors are volunteers. They get travel to meetings paid for and that’s it.
I agree. And shouldn’t Hong and Legendre be refusing these roles for those same reasons? Or minimally speaking out about how it is wrong? Let’s hold them accountable too.
And part of the problem here is that it means there’s actually less athlete representation. Instead of having athlete reps on the board + an athlete task force, we have an athlete task force that includes the athlete reps, so… we have… fewer opportunities for athletes to be involved in the organization.
It’s not that I think there’s anything inherently wrong with Legendre or Hong; it’s that the more athletes are involved, the better.
So apparently Simone says she is doing all-around at Classic now. Meaning this discussion is moot. Or someone at USAG realized, whoops, and told her she had to do AA to compete at Nationals. Which might have been helpful to know earlier. Hopefully it was her own choice.