Category Archives: Fun with Numbers

On Kyla, Gabby, and How It Doesn’t Really Matter

It occurs to me I never wrapped up my thoughts on the national championship, so here are just a few behind-schedule cognitive tangles about that competition before we move on to remembering that there are still two more national team camps before the WC squad is named and two more months until the actual competition.

On day 2 of nationals for the women, the world righted itself, with most of the competitors remembering that hitting routines is a thing you should probably do. It also reinforced why prospective team selection is such a fun game. There are a TON of realistic permutations for Worlds teams this year, all of which will end up scoring very similarly to one another, and some of which belie visual impressions from the competition. But which one do you choose?

Take Kyla, for example. Expectations are a funny thing. Kyla has been a top-2 AAer for the US this whole quad, majoring in not sucking at bars. So when she suddenly has a nasty Nationals and looks weak on bars, the sky is falling. That was certainly the attitude of our broadcast team. Al was even asking whether Kyla would make the selection camp. (Tim was like, “Derp. Obvi she’s making the selection camp.”) Yes correct, Tim.

But to me, and contrary to the overall tone of things, Kyla helped her chances to make the team with her performance on day 2 of nationals. At least, she made an argument for including her in the squad that she didn’t make on day 1. No, bars is not happening. But at this moment, it’s not really about bars for her. That’s the big change in expectations we have to make. With her current routine composition, Kyla isn’t making the team to do bars in TF even if she shaves several inches off her height and lands a dismount. (If she returns to her planned 6.3 and can hit by selection camp, it’s a different story, but that’s a lot to do.) Right now, it’s about beam. That’s where she can be top three. And she stepped up like hell there and did her job on day 2.

In fact, because she did her job (scoring several tenths ahead of a connection-free Aly Raisman and a strong Alyssa Baumann, and a point ahead of a wobbly Gabby Douglas), suddenly a team with Kyla on it makes a little sense now and outscores many of the other permutations. At least on the day. Playing the same game I did for day 1 scores, here’s the way some possible teams stack up according exclusively to their day 2 scores. 

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Key, Kocian, Ross – 185.500 (Day 1: 181.750)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 45.850: Kocian 15.600, Key 15.300, Biles 14.950
BB – 46.100: Biles 15.900, Ross 15.250, Raisman 14.950
FX – 46.050: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Key 14.700

This team didn’t score very well based on day 1 scores, but on day 2 it was stellar. Note that there’s a serious name missing from this group. This is why the numbers and team combinations sometimes don’t reinforce original visual impressions. Gabby had a pretty nice performance on day 2 (not Classics nice, but solid), and Kyla did not. Nonetheless, here we are, with this team and a 185.500. Now, I still think Gabby is necessary to the team and is among the safest selections, but she needs to show some “you have to take me” scores at camp to confirm her spot, particularly by outscoring Bailie Key on bars. Showing Classic-level beam would be nice too, though that wouldn’t be so nice for Kyla.

And to be fair, it’s not like a team with Douglas on it is scoring at all differently from this one. It’s just an interesting development. If you’re asking me my team, Gabby is on it without much hesitation.

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Douglas, Kocian, Ross – 185.400 (Day 1: 181.850)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 45.650: Kocian 15.600, Douglas 15.100, Biles 14.950
BB – 46.100: Biles 15.900, Ross 15.250, Raisman 14.950
FX – 46.150: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Douglas 14.800

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Key, Kocian, Locklear – 185.400 (Day 1: 181.350)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 46.350: Kocian 15.600, Locklear 15.450, Key 15.300
BB – 45.500: Biles 15.900, Raisman 14.950, Nichols 14.650
FX – 46.050: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Key 14.700

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Douglas, Kocian, Locklear – 185.300 (Day 1: 182.100)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 46.150: Kocian 15.600, Locklear 15.450, Douglas 15.100
BB – 45.500: Biles 15.900, Raisman 14.950, Nichols 14.650
FX – 46.150: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Douglas 14.800

(I REALLY like this team, but it relies on someone—Douglas—pulling a third beam routine together to be as competitive as the others.)

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Douglas, Kocian, Baumann – 185.200 (Day 1: 182.600)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 45.650: Kocian 15.600, Douglas 15.100, Biles 14.950
BB – 45.900: Biles 15.900, Baumann 15.050, Raisman 14.950
FX – 46.150: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Douglas 14.800

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Douglas, Key, Kocian – 185.150 (Day 1: 181.950)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 46.000: Kocian 15.600, Key 15.300, Douglas 15.100
BB – 45.500: Biles 15.900, Raisman 14.950, Nichols 14.650
FX – 46.150: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Douglas 14.800

Some of these options emphasize why Bailie Key is part of a safer team selection (she can go up on any event whenever and give you a usable score, which is a very convincing argument with Martha), but if you’re only using her for bars in TF, there are other choices.

Biles, Raisman, Nichols, Douglas, Key, Ross – 185.100 (Day 1: 181.600)
VT – 47.500: Biles 16.300, Nichols 15.850, Raisman 15.350
UB – 45.350: Key 15.300, Douglas 15.100, Biles 14.950
BB – 46.100: Biles 15.900, Ross 15.250, Raisman 14.950
FX – 46.150: Biles 15.850, Raisman 15.500, Douglas 14.800

More than anything else, these scores reinforce that it’s all essentially the same. Based on day 2 (a day of hit routines), all these different teams—leaving off Kyla, leaving off Bailie, leaving off Gabby—are scoring within a few tenths of each other. Choose any of the above, and it will be fine. The final scores will turn out about the same, and no one will have much of an argument that the selected team is unfair. Do whatever. Have a ball.

Onward to Nationals

One week to go until the national championship. Start getting emotionally prepared. Here’s a look at how the semifinals will shape up. 

We’ve ended up with a relatively lopsided arrangement this year, with one semifinal featuring three clear favorites in Oklahoma, LSU, and Alabama, and the other containing a whole bunch of bubble teams. That afternoon semifinal is going to be serious and seriously competitive, so make sure you’ll be available to lap up the whole thing at the super convenient time of 1pm CT on a Friday. Everyone’s always free then, right?

I’ll do the usual previewing next week and break down some of these rotation orders (UCLA starts on floor, so Miss Val will already have broken six vases about it because we know how she feels about starting on floor). But for now, here’s the scoring comparison for the teams in each semifinal, including all the usual info along with the scores achieved on each event at regionals. Categories in which a team ranks in the top three (qualifying position) are highlighted in blue.

SEMIFINAL 1

FLORIDA
Regional score: 197.475 [2]
RQS: 197.790 [1]
Season high: 198.225 [2]
Regular season average: 197.536 [1]
VT average: 49.482 [1]
VT RQS: 49.540 [2]
VT regional score: 49.625 [1]
UB average: 49.409 [1]
UB RQS: 49.500 [1]

UB regional score: 49.125 [4]
BB average: 49.225 [2]
BB RQS: 49.360 [2]
BB regional score: 49.325 [3]
FX average: 49.420 [1]
FX RQS: 49.505 [1]
FX regional score: 49.400 [2]

UTAH
Regional score: 196.575 [6]
RQS: 197.670 [2]
Season high: 198.250 [1]
Regular season average: 197.418 [2]
VT average: 49.480 [2]
VT RQS: 49.560 [1]
VT regional score: 49.500 [2]
UB average: 49.398 [2]
UB RQS: 49.500 [1]

UB regional score: 49.075 [5]
BB average: 49.205 [3]
BB RQS: 49.320 [4]
BB regional score: 48.625 [6]
FX average: 49.336 [2]
FX RQS: 49.415 [2]
FX regional score: 49.375 [3]

MICHIGAN
Regional score: 197.000 [4]
RQS: 197.270 [3]
Season high: 197.825 [5]
Regular season average: 197.143 [3]
VT average: 49.264 [4]
VT RQS: 49.330 [4] 
VT regional score: 49.175 [6] 
UB average: 49.264 [3]
UB RQS: 49.370 [4]
UB regional score: 49.150 [3]
BB average: 49.286 [1]
BB RQS: 49.325 [3]

BB regional score: 49.250 [4]
FX average: 49.330 [3]
FX RQS: 49.365 [3]
FX regional score: 49.425 [1]

UCLA
Regional score: 197.500 [1]
RQS: 197.200 [4]
Season high: 197.950 [3]
Regular season average: 196.768 [4]
VT average: 49.325 [3]
VT RQS: 49.375 [3]

VT regional score: 49.300 [5]
UB average: 49.066 [6]
UB RQS: 49.280 [6]
UB regional score: 49.275 [2]
BB average: 49.184 [4]
BB RQS: 49.400 [1]
BB regional score: 49.550 [1]

FX average: 49.193 [4]
FX RQS: 49.340 [4]
FX regional score: 49.375 [3]

GEORGIA
Regional score: 197.025 [3]
RQS: 196.875 [5]
Season high: 197.450 [6]
Regular season average: 196.375 [5]
VT average: 49.217 [5]
VT RQS: 49.280 [5]
VT regional score: 49.400 [3]
UB average: 49.260 [4]
UB RQS: 49.320 [5]
UB regional score: 49.325 [1]
BB average: 48.798 [6]
BB RQS: 49.195 [6]
BB regional score: 48.950 [5]
FX average: 49.100 [5]
FX RQS: 49.295 [5]
FX regional score: 49.350 [5]

STANFORD
Regional score: 197.000 [4]
RQS: 196.720 [6]
Season high: 197.525 [5]
Regular season average: 196.180 [6]
VT average: 49.136 [6]
VT RQS: 49.280 [5]
VT regional score: 49.375 [4]
UB average: 49.091 [5]
UB RQS: 49.420 [3]
UB regional score: 49.025 [6]
BB average: 49.009 [5]
BB RQS: 49.225 [5]
BB regional score: 49.375 [2]
FX average: 48.943 [6]
FX RQS: 49.185 [6]
FX regional score: 49.225 [6] 

There’s so much variation in the rankings in this first semifinal, which is why I hope it will be extremely competitive. All of the teams have at least a couple categories in the blue, and five of the six teams are ranked first in at least one category. The top three seeds are leading the overall season categories (obviously), but UCLA and Georgia pick up some ground based on strong regional performances that they hope are indicative of things to come.

Contrast that with the relatively clean-looking second semifinal. Rare is the category in which the top three seeds don’t rank in the top three, with only the doubts looming over LSU’s bars rotation and the strength of Nebraska’s vault as true complications to that picture.

SEMIFINAL 2

OKLAHOMA
Regional score: 197.625 [1]
RQS: 197.895 [1]
Season high: 198.500 [1]
Regular season average: 197.675 [1]
VT average: 49.456 [1]
VT RQS: 49.495 [2]
VT regional score: 49.525 [1]
UB average: 49.408 [1]
UB RQS: 49.475 [1]
UB regional score: 49.275 [2]
BB average: 49.363 [1]
BB RQS: 49.530 [1]
BB regional score: 49.375 [2]
FX average: 49.448 [1]
FX RQS: 49.505 [2]
FX regional score: 49.450 [1]

LSU
Regional score: 197.175 [3]
RQS:197.650 [2]
Season high: 198.375 [2]
Regular season average: 197.484 [2]
VT average: 49.455 [2]
VT RQS: 49.540 [1]
VT regional score: 49.475 [2]
UB average: 49.298 [2]
UB RQS: 49.390 [2]
UB regional score: 49.050 [5]
BB average: 49.284 [2]
BB RQS: 49.355 [2]
BB regional score: 49.200 [3]
FX average: 49.448 [1]
FX RQS: 49.560 [1]
FX regional score: 49.450 [1]

ALABAMA
Regional score: 197.575 [2]
RQS:197.490 [3]
Season high: 197.800 [3]
Regular season average: 197.175 [3]
VT average: 49.371 [4]
VT RQS: 49.460 [3]
VT regional score: 49.425 [3]
UB average: 49.206 [3]
UB RQS: 49.390 [3]
UB regional score: 49.350 [1]
BB average: 49.200 [3]
BB RQS: 49.335 [3] 
BB regional score: 49.500 [1]
FX average: 49.398 [3]
FX RQS: 49.465 [3]
FX regional score: 49.300 [4]

AUBURN
Regional score: 196.900 [5]
RQS: 197.045 [4]
Season high:197.750 [4]
Regular season average: 196.635 [4]
VT average: 49.196 [5]
VT RQS: 49.345 [5]
VT regional score: 49.400 [4]
UB average: 49.152 [4]
UB RQS: 49.265 [4]
UB regional score: 49.225 [3]
BB average: 49.088 [4]
BB RQS: 49.315 [4]
BB regional score: 49.100 [5]
FX average: 49.200 [4]
FX RQS: 49.315 [6]
FX regional score: 49.175 [6]

NEBRASKA
Regional score: 196.950 [4]
RQS: 196.900 [5]
Season high: 197.325 [5]
Regular season average: 196.618 [5]
VT average: 49.400 [3]
VT RQS: 49.450 [4]
VT regional score: 49.375 [5]
UB average: 49.034 [5]
UB RQS: 49.220 [5]
UB regional score: 49.175 [4]
BB average: 48.984 [6]
BB RQS: 49.110 [6]
BB regional score: 49.000 [6]
FX average: 49.198 [5]
FX RQS: 49.325 [5]
FX regional score: 49.400 [3]

OREGON STATE
Regional score:196.750 [6]
RQS: 196.680 [6]
Season high: 197.250 [6]
Regular season average: 196.352 [6]
VT average: 49.155 [6]
VT RQS: 49.285 [6]
VT regional score: 49.350 [6]
UB average: 48.998 [6]
UB RQS: 49.215 [6]
UB regional score: 48.975 [6]
BB average: 49.059 [5]
BB RQS: 49.145 [5]
BB regional score: 49.125 [4]
FX average: 49.141 [6]
FX RQS: 49.360 [4]
FX regional score: 49.300 [4]

Regional Scoring Comparison

A weekend without women’s college gymnastics. What are we going to do? Good thing they’ve scheduled Jesolo for tomorrow, which I assume was done specifically with us in mind so that we don’t have withdrawal symptoms. Very considerate.

I’ll get into the real business of regional previews at some point. Perhaps. Maybe. But for now, I have some numbers. They’ll be helpful in making any sort of apparatus-based regional prognoses. For each regional, I have assembled a batch of vaguely relevant scores and averages (using home averages for host teams and road averages for everyone else, which should help provide a method to evaluate how much boost the host teams may get from being at home). Each score is followed by the team’s ranking within the regional in that category, with blue indicating that a team is overperforming its seeding in that category and that other weird color indicating that a team is underperforming its seeding in that category. That should give a quick glance at what some of the danger areas are for each team, as well as where those teams might pick up some ground. You’ll see that, as expected, the category rankings for the Morgantown and Berkeley regionals are all over place. They’ll be the most fun.

NORMAN, OKLAHOMA REGIONAL:

[1] Oklahoma
RQS: 197.895 [1]
Season high: 198.500 [1]
Season average: 197.675 [1]
Home average: 197.963 [1]
VT RQS: 49.495 [1]
VT average: 49.456 [1]
Home VT average: 49.494 [1]
UB RQS: 49.475 [1]
UB average: 49.408 [1]
Home UB average: 49.413 [1]
BB RQS: 49.530 [1]
BB average: 49.363 [1]
Home BB average: 49.544 [1]
FX RQS: 49.560 [1]
FX average: 49.448 [1]
Home FX average: 49.513 [1]

[2] Oregon State
RQS: 196.680 [2]
Season high: 197.250 [2]
Season average: 196.352 [2]
Road average: 196.592 [2]
VT RQS: 49.285 [3]
VT average: 49.155 [3]
Road VT average: 49.175 [3]
UB RQS: 49.215 [2]

UB average: 48.998 [4]
Road UB average: 49.113 [3]

BB RQS: 49.145 [2]
BB average: 49.059 [2]
Road BB average: 49.092 [2]
FX RQS: 49.360 [2]
FX average: 49.141 [2]
Road FX average: 49.213 [2]

[3] Penn State
RQS: 196.665 [3]
Season high: 197.025 [3]
Season average: 196.282 [3]
Road average: 196.321 [3]
VT RQS: 49.310 [2]
VT average: 49.205 [2]
Road VT average: 49.271 [2]
UB RQS: 49.180 [3]
UB average: 49.089 [2]
Road UB average: 49.125 [2]
BB RQS: 49.125 [3]
BB average: 48.945 [3]
Road BB average: 48.979 [3]
FX RQS: 49.190 [3]
FX average: 49.043 [3]
Road FX average: 48.946 [3]

[4] Southern Utah
RQS: 196.100 [4]
Season high: 196.475 [4]
Season average: 195.644 [4]
Road average: 195.529 [4]
VT RQS: 49.055 [4]
VT average: 48.979 [4]
Road VT average: 48.946 [5]
UB RQS: 49.095 [4]
UB average: 49.025 [3]
Road UB average: 48.975 [4]
BB RQS: 49.045 [4]
BB average: 48.773 [4]
Road BB average: 48.850 [4]
FX RQS: 49.060 [5]
FX average: 48.867 [5]
Road FX average: 48.758 [5]

[5] Missouri
RQS: 195.720 [5]
Season high: 196.150 [6]
Season average: 195.131 [5]
Road average: 195.125 [6]
VT RQS: 49.030 [6]
VT average: 48.935 [6]
Road VT average: 48.883 [6]
UB RQS: 48.975 [5]
UB average: 48.775 [5]
Road UB average: 48.725 [6]
BB RQS: 48.890 [5]
BB average: 48.552 [5]
Road BB average: 48.788 [5]
FX RQS: 49.120 [4]
FX average: 48.869 [4]
Road FX average: 48.721 [6]

[6] NC State
RQS: 195.385 [6]
Season high: 196.175 [5]
Season average: 194.746 [6]
Road average: 195.250 [5]
VT RQS: 49.045 [5]
VT average: 48.950 [5]
Road VT average: 48.963 [4]
UB RQS: 48.885 [6]
UB average: 48.650 [6]
Road UB average: 48.763 [5]
BB RQS: 48.720 [6]
BB average: 48.484 [6]
Road BB average: 48.663 [6]
FX RQS: 48.905 [6]
FX average: 48.661 [6]
Road FX average: 48.863 [4]

MORGANTOWN, WEST VIRGINIA REGIONAL

[1] Florida
RQS: 197.790 [1]
Season high: 198.225 [1]
Season average: 197.536 [1]
Road average: 197.308 [1]
VT RQS: 49.540 [1]
VT average: 49.482 [1]
Road VT average: 49.508 [1]
UB RQS: 49.500 [1]
UB average: 49.409 [1]
Road UB average: 49.371 [1]
BB RQS: 49.360 [1]
BB average: 49.225 [1]
Road BB average: 49.071 [2]
FX RQS: 49.505 [1]
FX average: 49.420 [1]
Road FX average: 49.367 [1]

[2] Stanford
RQS: 196.720 [2]
Season high: 197.525 [2]
Season average: 196.180 [3]
Road average: 195.903 [3]
VT RQS: 49.280 [2]
VT average: 49.136 [3]
Road VT average: 49.122 [3]
UB RQS: 49.420 [2]
UB average: 49.091 [3]
Road UB average: 48.963 [3]
BB RQS: 49.225 [2]
BB average: 49.009 [3]
Road BB average: 49.009 [3]
FX RQS: 49.185 [3]
FX average: 48.943 [5]
Road FX average: 48.809 [5]

[3] Illinois
RQS: 196.515 [3]
Season high: 197.350 [3]
Season average: 196.210 [2]
Road average: 196.246 [2]
VT RQS: 49.065 [4]
VT average: 48.981 [4]
Road VT average: 49.004 [4]
UB RQS: 49.305 [3]
UB average: 49.204 [2]
Road UB average: 49.218 [2]
BB RQS: 49.200 [3]
BB average: 49.065 [2]
Road BB average: 49.107 [1]
FX RQS: 49.100 [5]
FX average: 48.960 [4]
Road FX average: 48.918 [4]

[4] Arkansas
RQS: 196.285 [4]
Season high: 196.650 [4]
Season average:195.900 [4]
Road average: 195.804 [4]
VT RQS: 49.280 [2]
VT average: 49.225 [2]
Road VT average: 49.179 [2]
UB RQS: 49.095 [4]
UB average: 48.968 [4]
Road UB average: 48.904 [4]
BB RQS: 48.755 [5]
BB average: 48.495 [6]
Road BB average: 48.600 [5]
FX RQS: 49.260 [2]
FX average: 49.211 [2]
Road FX average: 49.121 [2]

[5] New Hampshire
RQS: 195.860 [5]
Season high: 196.525 [5]
Season average: 195.138 [5]
Road average: 194.879 [6]
VT RQS: 48.875 [6]
VT average: 48.783 [6]
Road VT average: 48.746 [6]
UB RQS: 48.915 [5]
UB average: 48.690 [5]
Road UB average: 48.625 [6]
BB RQS: 49.065 [4]
BB average: 48.883 [4]
Road BB average: 48.854 [4]
FX RQS: 49.010 [6]
FX average: 48.781 [6]
Road FX average: 48.654 [6]

[6] West Virginia
RQS: 195.355 [6]
Season high: 196.075 [6]
Season average: 194.996 [6]
Home average: 195.325 [5]
VT RQS: 49.015 [5]
VT average: 48.918 [5]
Home VT average: 48.845 [5]
UB RQS: 48.680 [6]
UB average: 48.545 [6]
Home UB average: 48.795 [5]
BB RQS: 48.720 [6]
BB average: 48.559 [5]
Home BB average: 48.575 [6]
FX RQS: 49.125 [4]
FX average: 48.973 [3]
Home FX average: 49.110 [3]

BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA REGIONAL

[1] Utah
RQS: 197.670 [1]
Season high: 198.250 [1]
Season average: 197.418 [1]
Road average: 197.185 [1]
VT RQS: 49.560 [1]
VT average: 49.480 [1] 
Road VT average: 49.440 [1]
UB RQS: 49.500 [1]
UB average: 49.398 [1]
Road UB average: 49.365 [1]
BB RQS: 49.320 [1]
BB average: 49.205 [1]
Road BB average: 49.110 [1]
FX RQS: 49.425 [1]
FX average: 49.336 [1]
Road FX average: 49.270 [2]  

[2] Georgia
RQS: 196.875 [2]
Season high: 197.450 [2]
Season average: 196.375 [2] 
Road average: 196.179 [3]
VT RQS: 49.280 [2]
VT average: 49.217 [3] 
Road VT average: 49.196 [4]
UB RQS: 49.320 [2]
UB average: 49.260 [2]
Road UB average: 49.254 [2]
BB RQS: 49.195 [2]
BB average: 48.798 [3]
Road BB average: 48.650 [4]
FX RQS: 49.295 [2]
FX average: 49.100 [3] 
Road FX average: 49.083 [3]  

[3] Boise State
RQS: 196.495 [3]
Season high: 196.800 [4] 
Season average: 196.107 [3] 
Road average: 195.921 [4]
VT RQS: 49.265 [4]
VT average: 49.230 [2] 
Road VT average: 49.218 [3]
UB RQS: 49.320 [2]
UB average: 49.239 [3]
Road UB average: 49.211 [3]
BB RQS: 48.945 [3]
BB average: 48.820 [2]
Road BB average: 48.829 [2]
FX RQS: 49.110 [6]
FX average: 48.818 [6] 
Road FX average: 48.664 [6]   

[4] Cal
RQS: 196.240 [4]
Season high: 197.325 [3] 
Season average: 195.863 [4] 
Home average: 196.256 [2] 
VT RQS: 49.275 [3] 
VT average: 49.154 [4] 
Home VT average: 49.281 [2] 
UB RQS: 49.140 [4]
UB average: 49.004 [4] 
Home UB average: 49.050 [4]
BB RQS: 48.770 [5]
BB average: 48.552 [5] 
Home BB average: 48.581 [5]
FX RQS: 49.295 [2] 
FX average: 49.152 [2]
Home FX average: 49.344 [1]  

[5] Utah State
RQS: 195.560 [5]
Season high: 196.35 [6] 
Season average: 195.096 [5] 
Road average: 195.238 [5]
VT RQS: 48.975 [6] 
VT average: 48.940 [5] 
Road VT average: 48.916 [6]
UB RQS: 48.885 [5]
UB average: 48.583 [6]
Road UB average: 48.640 [6]
BB RQS: 48.900 [4]
BB average: 48.658 [4]
Road BB average: 48.747 [3]
FX RQS: 49.125 [5]
FX average: 48.915 [5] 
Road FX average: 48.934 [4]   

[6] BYU
RQS: 195.365 [6]
Season high: 196.375 [5]
Season average: 194.818 [6] 
Road average: 194.921 [6]
VT RQS: 49.000 [5]
VT average: 48.905 [6]
Road VT average: 48.921 [5]
UB RQS: 48.880 [6]
UB average: 48.716 [5]
Road UB average: 48.683 [5]
BB RQS: 48.585 [6]
BB average: 48.234 [6]
Road BB average: 48.446 [6]
FX RQS: 49.165 [4]
FX average: 48.964 [4] 
Road FX average: 48.871 [5]   

AMES, IOWA REGIONAL

[1] LSU
RQS: 197.650 [1]
Season high: 198.375 [1]
Season average: 197.484 [1] 
Road average: 197.242 [1]
VT RQS: 49.540 [1]
VT average: 49.455 [1]
Road VT average: 49.479 [1] 
UB RQS: 49.390 [1]
UB average: 49.298 [1]
Road UB average: 49.183 [1]
BB RQS: 49.355 [1] 
BB average: 49.284 [1]
Road BB average: 49.154 [1]
FX RQS: 49.560 [1]
FX average: 49.448 [1]
Road FX average: 49.425 [1]   

[2] Nebraska
RQS: 196.990 [2]
Season high: 197.325 [2]
Season average: 196.618 [2] 
Road average: 196.545 [2]
VT RQS: 49.450 [2] 
VT average: 49.400 [2]
Road VT average: 49.380 [2]
UB RQS: 49.220 [2]
UB average: 49.034 [2]
Road UB average: 49.145 [2]
BB RQS: 49.110 [2]
BB average: 48.984 [2]
Road BB average: 48.755 [3]
FX RQS: 49.325 [3]
FX average: 49.198 [2]
Road FX average: 49.265 [2]   

[3] Denver
RQS: 196.455 [3]
Season high: 196.925 [3]
Season average: 195.960 [3] 
Road average: 195.854 [3]
VT RQS: 49.305 [3]
VT average: 49.192 [3] 
Road VT average: 49.193 [3] 
UB RQS: 48.975 [5]
UB average: 48.835 [4]
Road UB average: 48.789 [5]
BB RQS: 49.070 [3]
BB average: 48.769 [4]
Road BB average: 48.721 [5]
FX RQS: 49.330 [2]
FX average: 49.163 [3] 
Road FX average: 49.150 [3]    

[4] Washington
RQS: 196.030 [4]
Season high: 196.600 [4]
Season average:195.646 [4]
Road average: 195.846 [4]
VT RQS: 48.985 [4]
VT average: 48.864 [4] 
Road VT average: 48.863 [5] 
UB RQS: 49.080 [3]
UB average: 48.898 [3]
Road UB average: 49.067 [3]
BB RQS: 49.055 [4]
BB average: 48.961 [3]
Road BB average: 49.017 [2] 
FX RQS: 49.095 [5]
FX average: 48.923 [5]
Road FX average: 48.900 [6]   

[5] Michigan State
RQS: 195.710 [5]
Season high: 196.325 [5] 
Season average: 195.117 [5] 
Road average: 195.158 [6]
VT RQS: 48.890 [5]
VT average: 48.804 [5]
Road VT average: 48.769 [6] 
UB RQS: 48.980 [4]
UB average: 48.777 [5]
Road UB average: 48.692 [6]
BB RQS: 48.895 [5]
BB average: 48.542 [5]
Road BB average: 48.747 [4]
FX RQS: 49.235 [4]
FX average: 48.994 [4] 
Road FX average: 48.950 [4] 

[6] Iowa State
RQS: 195.390 [6]
Season high: 195.950 [6] 
Season average: 194.902 [6] 
Home average: 195.365 [5]
VT RQS: 48.875 [6]
VT average: 48.783 [6] 
Home VT average: 48.920 [4] 
UB RQS: 48.900 [6]
UB average: 48.727 [6]
Home UB average: 48.805 [4]
BB RQS: 48.815 [6]
BB average: 48.513 [6] 
Home BB average: 48.700 [6]
FX RQS: 49.010 [6]
FX average: 48.879 [6] 
Home FX average: 48.940 [5]  

AUBURN, ALABAMA REGIONAL

[1] Alabama
RQS: 197.490 [1]
Season high: 197.800 [1] 
Season average: 197.175 [1] 
Road average: 197.104 [2]
VT RQS: 49.460 [1]
VT average: 49.371 [1] 
Road VT average: 49.350 [1] 
UB RQS: 49.390 [1]
UB average: 49.206 [1]
Road UB average: 49.267 [2]
BB RQS: 49.335 [1]
BB average: 49.200 [1]
Road BB average: 49.088 [2
FX RQS: 49.465 [1]
FX average: 49.398 [1]
Road FX average: 49.400 [1]   

[2] Auburn
RQS: 197.045 [2]
Season high: 197.750 [2] 
Season average: 196.635 [2]
Home average: 197.170 [1]
VT RQS: 49.345 [2]
VT average: 49.196 [2]
Home VT average: 49.310 [2] 
UB RQS: 49.265 [2]
UB average: 49.152 [2] 
Home UB average: 49.295 [1]
BB RQS: 49.315 [2]
BB average: 49.088 [2]
Home BB average: 49.225 [1] 
FX RQS: 49.315 [2]
FX average: 49.200 [2] 
Home FX average: 49.340 [2]  

[3] Minnesota
RQS: 196.450 [3]
Season high: 196.875 [3]
Season average: 195.598 [3] 
Road average: 195.642 [3]
VT RQS: 49.255 [4]
VT average: 49.102 [4] 
Road VT average: 49.125 [3] 
UB RQS: 48.980 [4]
UB average: 48.760 [4]
Road UB average: 48.617 [5]
BB RQS: 49.045 [3]
BB average: 48.723 [3]
Road BB average: 48.863 [3]
FX RQS: 49.200 [3]
FX average: 48.998 [5] 
Road FX average: 49.004 [3]   

[4] Iowa
RQS: 196.030 [4]
Season high: 196.500 [5] 
Season average: 195.434 [4] 
Road average: 195.354 [4]
VT RQS: 49.045 [6] 
VT average: 48.782 [6] 
Road VT average: 48.761 [6] 
UB RQS: 49.175 [3]
UB average: 49.005 [3]
Road UB average: 48.957 [3] 
BB RQS: 49.010 [4]
BB average: 48.641 [4]
Road BB average: 48.671 [4] 
FX RQS: 49.060 [5]
FX average: 49.007 [3] 
Road FX average: 48.964 [4]  

[5] Maryland
RQS: 195.505 [5]
Season high: 196.075 [6] 
Season average: 194.981 [6] 
Road average: 195.275 [5]
VT RQS: 49.065 [5]
VT average: 49.002 [5] 
Road VT average: 49.025 [5] 
UB RQS: 48.920 [5]
UB average: 48.752 [5]
Road UB average: 48.868 [4]
BB RQS: 48.790 [5]
BB average: 48.454 [5]
Road BB average: 48.639 [5] 
FX RQS: 48.965 [6]
FX average: 48.773 [6] 
Road FX average: 48.743 [6]   

[6] George Washington
RQS: 195.490 [6]
Season high: 196.875 [3] 
Season average: 195.065 [5]
Road average: 194.700 [6]
VT RQS: 49.315 [3]
VT average: 49.127 [3] 
Road VT average: 49.044 [4] 
UB RQS: 48.735 [6]
UB average: 48.563 [6]
Road UB average: 48.359 [6]
BB RQS: 48.680 [6]
BB average: 48.375 [6]
Road BB average: 48.390 [6] 
FX RQS: 49.115 [4]
FX average: 49.000 [4] 
Road FX average: 48.906 [5]   

COLUMBUS, OHIO REGIONAL

[1] Michigan
RQS: 197.270 [1]
Season high: 197.825 [2] 
Season average: 197.143 [1] 
Road average: 197.017 [1]
VT RQS: 49.330 [2]
VT average: 49.264 [2]
Road VT average: 49.267 [2] 
UB RQS: 49.370 [1]
UB average: 49.264 [1]
Road UB average: 49.271 [1]
BB RQS: 49.325 [2]
BB average: 49.286 [1]
Road BB average: 49.263 [1]
FX RQS: 49.365 [1]
FX average: 49.330 [1] 
Road FX average: 49.217 [1]   

[2] UCLA
RQS: 197.200 [2]
Season high: 197.950 [1] 
Season average: 196.768 [2] 
Road average: 196.613 [2]
VT RQS: 49.375 [1]
VT average: 49.325 [1] 
Road VT average: 49.333 [1] 
UB RQS: 49.280 [2]
UB average: 49.066 [2]
Road UB average: 49.033 [2]
BB RQS: 49.400 [1]
BB average: 49.184 [2]
Road BB average: 49.058 [2] 
FX RQS: 49.340 [2]
FX average: 49.193 [2] 
Road FX average: 49.188 [2]  

[3] Arizona
RQS: 196.445 [3]
Season high: 197.125 [3]
Season average: 195.933 [3] 
Road average: 195.661 [3]
VT RQS: 49.020 [5]
VT average: 48.925 [4] 
Road VT average: 48.886 [5] 
UB RQS: 49.155 [3]
UB average: 48.992 [3]
Road UB average: 48.882 [3]
BB RQS: 49.120 [3]
BB average: 48.973 [3]
Road BB average: 48.964 [3]
FX RQS: 49.220 [4]
FX average: 49.044 [4] 
Road FX average: 48.929 [6]   

[4] Central Michigan
RQS: 196.190 [4]
Season high: 196.400 [5]
Season average: 195.110 [6] 
Road average: 195.625 [4]
VT RQS: 49.055 [3]
VT average: 48.871 [5] 
Road VT average: 49.004 [3] 
UB RQS: 49.115 [4]
UB average: 48.808 [5]
Road UB average: 48.875 [4]
BB RQS: 48.870 [5]
BB average: 48.377 [6]
Road BB average: 48.596 [4] 
FX RQS: 49.255 [3]
FX average: 49.054 [3] 
Road FX average: 49.150 [3]  

[5] Kentucky
RQS: 195.745 [5]
Season high: 196.575 [4] 
Season average: 195.468 [4] 
Road average: 195.071 [6]
VT RQS: 48.980 [6]
VT average: 48.855 [6]
Road VT average: 48.813 [6] 
UB RQS: 48.940 [5]
UB average: 48.861 [4]
Road UB average: 48.754 [6]
BB RQS: 48.985 [4]
BB average: 48.773 [4]
Road BB average: 48.529 [6]
FX RQS: 49.140 [5]
FX average: 48.980 [5]
Road FX average: 48.975 [5]   

[6] Ohio State 
RQS: 195.400 [6]
Season high: 196.200 [6] 
Season average: 195.169 [5] 
Home average: 195.335 [5]
VT RQS: 49.050 [4]
VT average: 48.963 [3] 
Home VT average: 48.960 [4] 
UB RQS: 48.795 [6]
UB average: 48.660 [6] 
Home UB average: 48.780 [5]
BB RQS: 48.845 [6]
BB average: 48.608 [5] 
Home BB average: 48.580 [5]
FX RQS: 49.080 [6]
FX average: 48.938 [6]
Home FX average: 49.015 [4] 

Returning Scores for 2015

Yesterday, the Oklahoma Sooners got all intrasquady and have posted a few videos to faceplace. At the very least, it appears we will have to change Chayse Capps Love Fest 2014 to Chayse Capps Love Fest 2015. Also Haley Scaman is getting really familiar with the floor this year.

In other news, while we wait for the coaches to release their annual and extremely meaningful poll so that we can spend a week making fun of it, I decided to check out how the top teams stack up based only on the scores they’re returning from their postseason lineups last season. Because why not. 

For each of the top 10 teams last season, I inserted the RQSs of the returning gymnasts back into the lineups on each event, then replaced all the lost scores from now-departed seniors with 9.800, dropping the lowest score as we always do. I chose 9.800 because for teams of the highest level, it is the baseline replacement-level score. They all should be able to come up with at least 9.800s from backups. It’s a fine, regular, middle-of-the-road score.

Ranking the teams like this is a way of seeing how much scoring value each team has lost since last year. We can always say that one team lost 10 routines while another lost only 4, but that doesn’t necessarily reflect the value of those individual routines. If a team is losing a bunch of routines, but they’re mostly 9.825s, it’s probably not that hard to replace those scores. If a team is losing a few routines, but they’re 9.950s, that’s going to be much harder. Inserting 9.800 in place of those scores illuminates how much scoring value the freshmen, injury returners, and backups from last season will have to contribute for the team to return to (or improve on) last year’s level, not just how many lineup spots they’ll have to fill.

For gymnasts without an RQS, or one that was not appropriately representative, I used the season average for hit routines, which best mimics what RQS is intended to tell us.

1. LSU – 197.725
Vault – 49.475 [2]
Bars – 49.320 [5]
Beam – 49.375 [1]
Floor – 49.555 [1]

2. OKLAHOMA – 197.650
Vault – 49.530 [1]
Bars – 49.353 [3]
Beam – 49.329 [2]
Floor – 49.438 [3]

3. FLORIDA – 197.600
Vault – 49.390 [4]
Bars – 49.360 [2]
Beam – 49.325 [3]
Floor – 49.525 [2]

-A clear top three emerges in LSU, Oklahoma, and Florida, which is not surprising. Along with Alabama, they were the top teams last season, and Alabama lost a big bag of essential routines.

-Of these three, Florida is taking the biggest knock this year without Caquatto and Johnson, but the Gators will balance that out by having the year’s most impressive freshman class. It does means that among these teams, Florida needs to get the most out of its freshmen and returning backups, whereas LSU is returning its entire floor lineup from Super Six last year, so further contribution there would just be a bonus.

-LSU is retaining the most value of any team, but that bars ranking (5th of these 10 teams) reflects the dire lack of Sarie Morrison. The other low(ish) team ranking in this group is Florida’s vault, with the 4th-best returning vault contingent, but they do look to be stronger there is season than last season with Kennedy Baker and Alex McMurtry coming in.

-Oklahoma is already returning the best vault scores, and now they’re adding Brenna Dowell and Ali Jackson. So there’s that. Interestingly, without Taylor Spears, Oklahoma drops below LSU on beam for its returning scores, but make no mistake, the Sooners won’t be throwing up some measly replacement-level 9.800 in that lineup.

4. UTAH – 197.331
Vault – 49.465 [3]
Bars – 49.335 [4]
Beam – 49.151 [7]
Floor – 49.380 [4]

-Utah lost quite a few routines, but most of the biggest scores are returning because Dabritz is still there. They do drop to 4th in returning floor scores because half the lineup is gone now. I’m interested to see who makes floor this year because it’s a real question for the first time in a while.

5. UCLA – 197.029
Vault – 49.160 [9]
Bars – 49.320 [5]
Beam – 49.315 [4]
Floor – 49.234 [5]

-This is the best illustration of why Pua Hall’s vault is UCLA’s most important freshman routine. Not having Olivia Courtney’s score in there really exposes UCLA’s recent struggles on that event. Still, 5th place in returning scores is higher than I thought it would be. 

6. ALABAMA – 196.967
Vault – 49.280 [7]
Bars – 49.320 [5]
Beam – 49.210 [5]
Floor – 49.157 [9]

-I’m actually impressed that Alabama stayed this high in these rankings given how many routines they have dropped. Nonetheless, it is evidence of how many new, significant routines they need this season, particularly on floor with three of their four best routines gone now. On that event, Alabama is going to have a “Where are the 9.9s?” kind of January. That’s my biggest question at least.

7. STANFORD – 196.964
Vault – 49.315 [6]
Bars – 49.315 [8]
Beam – 49.164 [6]
Floor – 49.170 [7]

-It’s interesting that when we use only the returning scores, all the Pac-12 teams move up. Stanford has lost a couple critical routines form last year in terms of wonderfulness, but not too many huge scores. With this roster, I have one condition for Stanford this year: You have to be amazing.

8. GEORGIA – 196.952
Vault – 49.215 [8]
Bars – 49.465 [1]
Beam – 49.082 [9]
Floor – 49.190 [6]

-Georgia is a little bit lower than they should be here because Brittany Rogers wasn’t in most of those postseason lineups even though she contributed to the team RQS throughout the season. So, the Gymdogs are returning more scores than it appears, particularly on vault and beam.

-MANY of the top teams have lost their best bars workers (Caquatto, Johnson, Spears, Morrison, Wong), but with Georgia retaining Rogers and Chelsea Davis and company, they start with a clear bars advantage over all the other teams. The rest have to use their various new Brenna Dowells to catch up.

9. NEBRASKA – 196.770
Vault – 49.360 [5]
Bars – 49.169 [9]
Beam – 49.092 [8]
Floor – 49.149 [10]

-Lack of Emily Wong. It’s good for no one.

-But, Grace Williams and Kamerin Moore.

10. MICHIGAN – 196.429
Vault – 49.085 [10]
Bars – 49.110 [10]
Beam – 49.075 [10]
Floor – 49.159 [8]

-Michigan lost the most of any of the top 10 teams by a pretty big margin. It was always going to happen with all those stars leaving at the same time.

-Like Georgia without Rogers, Michigan is returning more than is reflected here because of Sheppard missing the postseason last year.