The 2022 Code is Out!

The FIG has released the code of points for 2022-2024, which will go into effect on January 1, 2022 and (because of the everything) will last for just three years instead of the usual four—the triennium leading up to and including Paris 2024.

I did a side-by-side read of the 2017-2020 (2021…) code compared to the new code to account for all of the new rules, both big and small. Surprise, I already have strong opinions about all of them.

The Headlines

Maximum 1 wolf turn per routine – In typical FIG fashion, they looked at what everyone was talking about 8 years ago and said, “Check it, we’ve just had a great idea.” But I’m not complaining. A new rule for 2022 prohibits gymnasts from performing more than one wolf turn in any single beam or floor routine. All subsequent wolf turns will not be counted.

It’s a wildly important development to eliminate all those insufferable back-to-back wolf doubles and wolf triples. Now, I would have also liked to see the wolf turns on floor downgraded by a tenth, but we can’t have everything.

Upgrade of clear-hip hecht 1/2 – This may seem like a random thing to list among the headlines, but changing the value of the clear-hip hecht 1/2 from C to D should help vary bars composition by introducing an element that can be connected out of a bail handstand and back to the high bar for useful bonus.

After the elimination of the connection bonus for the bail handstand + stalder shoot, bails rapidly disintegrated from top elite routines as there wasn’t any real scoring incentive for performing them. The hope, at least, is that this will provide a viable transition option so that everything isn’t Pak + Shaposh.

The clear-hip hecht 1/2 has also been added to the list of exceptions for empty backswing deductions, like the Shaposhnikova skills.

Dismount Bonus – This is kind of a weird one. On bars, beam, and floor, a 0.2 bonus will now be awarded for (hit) dismounts rated D or higher. This isn’t necessarily bad thing—I’m in favor of encouraging difficult dismounts—but it’s strange because they JUST got rid of the composition requirement for D dismounts. This was presumably done to allow people who didn’t have a D dismount but had difficulty elsewhere to remain competitive. And then exactly what everyone knew would happen (slash the entire point?) happened and tons of gymnasts started dismounting beam with a 2/1 because they could. Now the FIG is like, “Oh wait never mind, do an uglier double tuck please.”

Tkatchev restriction – Starting in 2022, each routine may contain only one Tkatchev variation (without turning) from each line in the COP. What does that mean? Well, it means that you can only do one Tkatchev from each circle type in your routine. The toe-on Tkatchev variations—Ray, Church, Nabieva—are on the same line, which means you must pick only one to put in your routine. Theoretically, that should help alleviate some repetition issues.

Candle mount downgrade – There will be much rejoicing. The overused candle mount will be downgraded from a D to a C in the next code. We’re all happy about it.

Beam connection bonus changes – Connection bonus will return for acrobatic B+D combinations, performed in that order. (For example, back handspring + full-twisting back handspring.) Perfectly acceptable. That combination deserves bonus. I reserve the right to change my mind about that in November 2023.

Meanwhile, beam dismounts are no longer eligible for connection bonus. In theory, I don’t have a problem with awarding bonus for dismount combos on beam, but the way it was employed in the 2017 code was funky. You basically got an automatic 0.2 bonus for doing an F+ dismount, in addition to the value of the element. It didn’t work.

In other developments, the salto + scale bonus for 0.1 has been removed, you can’t get bonus for turn combinations on the same leg anymore, and you don’t get any connection bonus if you grab the beam during the combination.

Bars connection bonus changes – The combination of D + E flight elements has been downgraded from 0.2 bonus to 0.1. So that would be a combination like Pak + Van Leeuwen. Now it’s 0.1.

To get the 0.2 CV, these flight combinations must now be minimum E + E—like Church + Bhardwaj—or F + D—like the Nabieva + Pak.

I don’t exactly hate it, but this wasn’t on my list of most pressing changes. There were a lot of other things.

Rolls and flairs – Certain rolls and flairs are now eligible to fulfill the turn requirement on beam as an alternative to just standing there and suffering rigor mortis on a full turn. Hopefully people actually take advantage of this, but…

Reference judges have been removed – Previously at worlds/Olympics, there would be 2 D judges, 5 E judges, and 2 Reference judges whose scores were utilized in the event of E-score range problems or the like. Now, there will simply be 7 E judges, with the middle 3 scores averaged.


Nabieva downgrade – In addition to the clear-hip hecht 1/2, the other headline-grabbing value change is a downgrade to the Nabieva, which will go from G down to F. This is a popular change, which I understand because the Nabieva has gone from being a rare bird to being nearly compulsory for the best bars workers in recent years, but changing only this one skill value does lead to some strange value bunching for other variations.

Another vault massacre – The realization that vault is still scoring way, way, way higher than the other events has led to another 0.4 destruction of pretty much all the vaults. So you’re going to have a new set of vault values to learn. Or you can just give up. That’s fine too. I basically still think the Yurchenko 1.5 is 5.5.

So, the Yurchenko full will be 4.2, the DTY will be 5.0, and the Amanar will be 5.4. The Cheng goes from 6.0 to 5.6, and the Biles goes from 6.4 to 6.0. On handspring vaults, the rudi goes from 5.8 to 5.4, the Yeo goes from 6.2 to 5.8, and the Produnova goes from 6.4 to 6.0. The Tsuk double full goes from 5.6 to 5.2.

On the topic of Tsuks, we also have a new 0.3 deduction for insufficient pre-flight turn. So if you’re not showing an actual 1/4 turn and we might mistake it for a handspring…

Piked Jaeger – The piked Jaeger has been downgraded back to a D from an E. Well, that didn’t last long. What was even the point of that in the first place?

Teza bars elements – Rightfully so, Elvira Teza’s bars elements have received an upgrade from D to E for both the Teza Pak and Teza bail.

Fan dismount downgrade – Christ, they hate this dismount. I don’t really get why. The Fan dismount is now all the way down to a C. When we started the last quad, it was an E. It’s now the same value as a double pike, which I think is a bit silly.

Split leap downgrade – The split leap on beam has been brought back down to an A instead of a B. Phew. Maybe now we won’t have to see them anymore.

Wolf hop 2/1 – The wolf jump or hop 2/1 has been upgraded from D to E, which sounds like a nightmare.

Other elements

Bars – Clear straddle circle backward on HB with flight to low bar upgraded to C from B.

Beam – Two flairs beam mount upgraded to C from B.

Beam – Two flank circles to flair (Baitova) upgraded to D from C.

Beam – Cartwheel to front support mount downgraded to B from C.

Beam – The Yurchenko loop, Back dive from side position to front support upgraded to D from C.

Beam – Straight jump full downgraded to B from C. So goodbye straight jump fulls?

Floor – Straight jump full downgraded to A from B.

Floor – Wolf turn single upgraded B from A. Yeah, because that’s what we needed.

Named Skills

In the good department, the names have actually been added back to the skill boxes, which is much more helpful. In the bad department, still no one has bothered to fix all the spelling errors in the named-skill list. Sigh. How hard is that?

Other little weirdies

Artistry – The language for evaluating artistry has been rearranged and rephrased on beam and floor, and the judges have been given a checklist about it. A checklist, I tell you. Both beam and floor also now include a deduction for “insufficient involvement of the body parts.” SO BETTER GET THAT GALLBLADDER LOOKING ARTISTIC.

The “failure to engage the audience” language has been removed on floor, as has one of our favorite examples, the prohibition of using Tango music but Polka movements. Won’t somebody please think of the Polka movements?!?!?!

Can’t intentionally stay on the ground after a fall – A new “duty of the gymnast” has been added to say that gymnasts can’t intentionally remain on the ground after a miss to stop the fall clock from starting and can’t intentionally delay through adjusting of grips and whatnot, lest they incur a 0.3 deduction. How we think we’re going to be able to differentiate between intentional and necessary/incidental staying on the ground beats me.

Applications for new CV – The WTC will no longer consider submissions for new CV combinations, just elements. I mean, not that they were actually ever really considering them before, but you could theoretically apply.

Beam strength – Language has been added that beam should show variation in rhythm, strength, and pace of movement. This doesn’t actually mean anything, but it’s nice to see the actual use of the word strength in the code. Especially because the rest of it is still…

Feminine grace – The code of points has retained the language that “feminine grace” should be considered in evaluation floor expression. Barfo. I want a floor exercise of non-binary coarseness, and I want it now.

Entire length of the beam – It appears the language requiring use of the entire beam is gone. Which is weird?

Ring leap evaluation – The language for a ring leap that receives no credit has been changed from “back foot below shoulders” to “back foot below crown of head.” Also a 0.1 deduction has been added for a straightened back leg.

Brush clarification – Brushing/touching the apparatus or mat with hands, but not falling (or grabbing the beam), is officially 0.3 off. Now. Again.

Yurchenko layouts – The code has removed language that layout, non-turning vaults should be credited as piked if they don’t reach a completely full stretched position at any point during the vault. Lots of slightly piked Yurchenko layouts had been getting downgraded for this reason, while far more piked Yurchenko fulls were still getting layout credit, so there was an inherent inconsistency there.

Changing the UB height – Previously, height increases of 10 cm were permitted on bars for gymnasts who touch the mat with their feet. It is now 5 cm, but the bars themselves will be raised 5 cm for everyone. So everyone make sure you’re ready for that.

Cannot use water on the beam – This has been added to the “undisciplined and abusive behavior” section. Because that’s what abuse is. Beam water.

No changes to the leotard rules – Alas. They’re still straight out of the Phoebe Emerson Charm School and it’s awful. But at least male judges in women’s artistic are no longer required to wear a “white blouse” for competition.

Overtime – A gymnast must have gone at least a full second over time to get the deduction. The beam clock needs to say 1:31.

The addition of random capital words just everywhere – But for why?

THE FUTURE IS NOW – Breaking news, everyone. If you’re submitting a new skill, you no longer have to submit it via “electronic mail, facsimile, or post.” A “USB memory stick” is now the preferred method. Is this the Jetsons?!?!?!?!

What’s more, the code no longer claims that the floor music must be brought on a CD. But then how do you get it into the play machine?

Speaking of floor music, the human voice section of the code now says, “Any music which is not clearly a song or part of a song is accepted.” I mean, WE KNOW. But also what does this mean?

(Note: There are some other things, but they were too boring even for me.)

33 thoughts on “The 2022 Code is Out!”

  1. Seems like the Yang Yun Christ the Redeemer vault is the only one that didn’t get the 0.4 d-value chop (0.2 instead)

    Nellie Kim….a secret fan?

    1. STEALING ‘keerist the redeemer!!!!’ brilliant.
      SMELLY SCRIM wants to steal credit for it. ONLY possible reason.

  2. Downgrading the Nabieva, but not the Silivas (at least 2 CoPs overdue)?


    Also, USB? Glad they are at least finally catching up to 2004 technology.

    1. Nah. Nabs was due last CoP. Absolutely sucky execution usually and it’s no longer that hard for good bar workers. Silivas is hard to do well; the CoP is totally fucked on floor elements as you’ve probably noticed. (double Arabian-half anyone? JEEEZUSSSS H KEERIST.) Don’t really see Silivas getting less than Chuso, although the idea that Cojucar and dos Santos and back 3.5 are so bullshit underscored is vomitous.

  3. I’m legitimately cackling at “music which is not clearly a song or part of a song.” Like…what even do those words mean? I know what they THINK they mean, but thus is definitely a “you keep using those words, I don’t think they mean what you think they mean” situation.

    1. If we want to get really classical music school technical about it, to be a “song” it has to have words which are sung (hence the name), otherwise it’s a piece/tone poem/symphony/whatever BUT the previous language communicated the same idea a lot more clearly. No idea why they couldn’t just keep it

  4. As a note, the reason why the allowed amount to raise the bars was decreased is because the apparatus norms are also changing for the next quad and the bar rails will be set higher for everyone! I do wonder what the concrete interpretation of this rule is supposed to be in general, though. Like, if I’m 6’2″ and one extra notch up still leaves me with my feet dragging, am I allowed to iterate the process again and again until they’re not? Or do I just have to come up with a way to do my routine that’s entirely close-bar circles?

  5. Another quadrennium, another (mostly) useless set of changes to the code of points.

    One very subtle yet significant change is the reduction of the D + E flight connections on bars from 0.2 to 0.1. For a bars routine to be competitive, it pretty much has to be a series of connected flight elements between the bars, followed by a full pirouette and a dismount on the high bar. I hope that this slight devaluation will encourage gymnasts to go for some slightly different routine compositions.

    Regarding the skill value changes, as usual, the WTC selected a set of random skills to adjust seemingly just for the hell of it. Even though I agree with a majority of the value changes, the problem is that this is not a comprehensive or equitable review and adjustment of all skills. You shouldn’t devalue a skill like the candle mount because of overuse without reviewing all “overused” skills and adjusting accordingly. At the same time, front tumbling on floor has been untouched even though these skills are completely undervalued across the board.

    And once again, complex connections on floor such as the C+C and C+D are not rewarded properly…

  6. What does this look like?

    Bars – Clear straddle circle backward on HB with flight to low bar upgraded to C from B.

    1. It’s a straddle roll from stalder entry. Aka, a Pak salto from stalder entry with split legs in the air instead of keeping the legs together.

    2. Exactly zero people in the last 30 years have done this skill so why they chose this out of all the other skills that desperately need updated values is a mystery.

      1. Didn’t Amy Chow do the straddled Pak? I mean, it’s technically in the last thirty years, but she’s the only one I can think of doing this skill. It was a cool skill, so maybe they want someone to bring it back.

      2. There’s a difference between what Amy Chow did and what this skill is. Amy Chow swung forward with legs together and then straddled them when she began her salto. The skill that got upgraded starts with a stalder but instead of going to handstand, goes to a transition to the low bar. In other words, the legs are already straddled when the gymnast releases the high bar. Amy Chow’s transition is by far the more exciting and dynamic element. This other skill is a very slow element that pretty much worked only when the bars were close together.

        C transitions are 100% worthless in the current code since they break all bonus-earning connections. You used to be able to get a 0.1 bonus for a bail into a C transition back to the high bar which for some reason was removed. The result is that 90% of transitions you see now are Shaposh entries with the other 10% being an orphan toe shoot to the high bar.

        Regarding bail to high bar connections, exactly zero people will risk the ridiculously difficult and risky clear hip hecht 1/2 after a bail for a measly 0.1 so that upgrade was insufficient too. If the WTC really wanted some variety, they’d make all hecht variations an E to encourage some unique compositions.

  7. I’m glad the split leap on beam and straight jump full turn on floor have been downgraded to A. If Level-3 gymnasts can do a skill, said skills have no business being Bs.

    Also, I’d forgotten what an utter bad-ass Elvire Teza was. I love those Steinemann skills.

  8. better get that gallbladder looking artistic!!!! i spit out my coffee during that one. those kidney stones you have better be rocking in time to your POLKA MUSIC!!!!!!

  9. Okay, now that the Tezas are getting some upgrading, let’s get the Alt upgraded too in the next version.

    1. I think even an F-value is justified for Teza’s bars skills. German giants are completely extinct from today’s gymnastics and something that should be rewarded. Same for the Tkatchev variations done from German giants.

      1. I agree, but that will never happen as long as the E-cap on transitions is in place.

      2. They need to remove that arbitrary cap to properly reward skills like the Seitz and the Komova 1. And the Alt should be an E…

        I could go on and on with a list of wrongly values skills sadly 😞.

  10. Another big change to bars connections is that for E+E connections, only one element needs to be flight. This brings back valuable 0.2 connections for anyone who can do an inbar 1/1 or one-armed pirouette into an E flight skill. This new connection formula is likely the reason the piked Jaeger is now a D and not eligible for the 0.2 bonus.

    A routine like this would score massively even without a “big time” release skill:

    Inbar 1/1 + Komova II + Bhardwaj + Shap 1/2
    Inbar 1/2 + E pirouette + E pirouette + Jaeger 1/2 + Jaeger
    D+ Dismount

  11. I was expecting more fury at the “middle 3 out of 7” E scores will count, debacle.

    It’s like they intentionally want to keep the 0.333s as another way to break a tie.

    1. Since their ways of breaking ties are all stupid and they already have truncated scores stupidly for many years, I just don’t have the energy to argue about this one.

  12. So is this for JO also? I am trying to understand it. For ex, I saw somewhere it said a split full is a D now, is that just for elites or is it for everyone across the board?

    1. No, JO uses an entirely different code with different values for elements. The split leap full on BB is an E on both codes, though, and has been since the previous code. The split JUMP full on BB has been a D since the rio code I think? I think it might also be an E in JO but I am not sure.

  13. The one I find intriguing is that they added an alternative for the turn requirement on beam. Could make composition a little more interesting.

  14. The Fan dismount downgrade just further complicates the mess that is uneven bars dismounts. So a double front is a D, a double front half out is an E, a front half into back tuck is a D (Arai), and a half twist into double back will be a C?

    Just because Fan Yilin makes it look easy, it doesn’t mean it is (look at McCusker struggling with this vault for years…) Any dismount that starts with a forward giant already is difficult due to the awkward entry alone. All this will do is force more people to do the full-twisting double back tuck. Variety and originality should be rewarded!!

    Any double salto dismount that starts from a forward giant should be at least an E.

    1. *McCusker struggling with this dismount for years…

      PTSD from her scary vaults I guess lol

Comments are closed.