The 10s of Week 4

The 10.000s

Trinity Thomas – Vault – Florida


Makarri Doggette – Bars – Alabama


Ragan Smith – Beam – Oklahoma


The 9.975s

Trinity Thomas – Bars – Florida


Leanne Wong – Bars – Florida


Linda Zivat – Vault – Iowa


JerQuavia Henderson – Floor – Iowa


Mya Hooten – Floor – Minnesota


Isabella Magnelli – Beam – Kentucky


Derrian Gobourne – Floor – Auburn


Jade Carey – Beam – Oregon State (Friday)

[Lost like an ancient manuscript?]


Maile O’Keefe – Beam – Utah


Naomi Morrison – Vault – Michigan


Natalie Wojcik – Beam – Michigan


Katherine Levasseur – Vault – Oklahoma


Audrey Davis – Bars – Oklahoma


Jordan Chiles – Bars – UCLA


Jordan Chiles – Floor – UCLA


Jade Carey – Floor – Oregon State (Sunday)


The 9.950s

10.000/9.900 split

Grace McCallum – Bars – Utah


Sierra Brooks – Beam – Michigan


Hallie Copperwheat – Beam – Pittsburgh

[Lost like an ancient manuscript?]


The 9.925s

10.000/9.850 split

Adeline Kenlin – Floor – Iowa


3 thoughts on “The 10s of Week 4”

  1. I keep missing one routine from LIU, Mara consistently scores 9.95, never mentioned here though. Do it right, or don’t do it at all…

    1. Did she score a 10 from one judge on her 9.95 scores? He is only documenting the scores that were given a 10 from at least one judge in this series. So if she scored a 10 from one judge and a 9.9 from the other that would balance out to a 9.95 and she would get recognized here. If she scored a 9.95 from both judges it wouldn’t be featured here. Hopefully that makes sense to you.

    2. So you probably should UNDERSTAND what the discussion is before so rudely commenting as you end up looking like a fool. These routines are ones that received a 10 from at least ONE judge.
      Titarsolej went 9.950 against Cornell, but each judge scored it 9.950. There was no 10.0 flashed. If you are going to comment, do it right or don’t do it at all.

      Mara’s score breakdown is here J1 9.950 J2 9.950 score: 9.950
      https://www.liuathletics.com/documents/2023/1/29/WGYM_LIU_012923.pdf

Comments are closed.