2023 Utah Red Rocks

[wptb id=95687]

Ranking History
2022 – 3rd
2021 – 3rd
2020 – 4th
2019 – 7th
2018 – 5th
2017 – 5th
2016 – 9th
2015 – 2nd
2014 – 7th
2013 – 9th

Where 2022 Finished…

There aren’t many complaints Utah can have about the 2022 season. The team won the Pac-12 title again, advanced to the national championship, and finished a solid 3rd with three very competitive rotations. This is pretty much the exact same story as the 2021 season, for which Utah’s 3rd-place was hailed as an unequivocal victory given the clear improvements it showed over the run of 9th-5th-5th-7th finishes in the previous four postseasons. If there’s a frustration for Utah, it will be that the team clearly upgraded in talent in 2022 compared to 2021, just gobbling up all kinds of Olympians, and did so for…the exact same result.  

Now, after two straight seasons of 3rd place, doing it again wouldn’t feel like quite the same kind of victory. Does the team have more?

Gains and Losses

LOSTGAINED
Sydney Soloski – FXAbby Brenner – transfer
Alexia Burch – VT (UB, BB)Sarah Krump
Adrienne Randall – BB (FX)Makenna Smith
Cammy Hall – VT

The New Ones

Utah brings in only two first-year athletes this season, but we should expect to see plenty of Makenna Smith, who has raked in the podium finishes on vault and floor as a L10 for years. Her most important event for Utah is vault, where she shows a 10.0-start round-off 1/2-on front pike (Omelianchik) that should be one of the best-scoring vaults in the lineup, but Smith will also function as at least a viable option on all four events and should make several postseason lineups.

Sarah Krump is the only other first year joining Utah’s class. We didn’t see any of her at the Red Rocks Preview, but she did have a full-in on floor as an L10 athlete and has some potential as a beam development project on a team that doesn’t really need beamers right now.   

Abby Brenner joins Utah’s team for her fifth year of eligibility as a transfer from Michigan. Brenner has been a four-year regular in the vault, bars, and floor lineups for Michigan, known for her Yurchenko 1.5 on vault and full-in on floor. Perhaps her crowning achievement, though, was her last-minute return to the bars lineup for a team-leading 9.925 in Michigan’s 2021 championship performance after she had been injured on floor at the conference championship. With 9.9 ability on her three events, Brenner will look to get into all three lineups for Utah.

Overall, the turnover probably amounts to a slight upgrade in routine supply. The challenge for Utah, then, will be how to transform that slight upgrade into real-life improvement in the final results.

Event by Event

VAULT

2022 Event Ranking: 5

Lineup locks: Jaedyn Rucker, Grace McCallum, Makenna Smith, Abby Brenner, Lucy Stanhope
Lineup options: Sage Thompson, Jillian Hoffman, Jaylene Gilstrap, Maile O’Keefe, Alani Sabado, Kara Eaker

The most straightforward approach for Utah this year on vault would have first-year Makenna Smith and transfer Abby Brenner slot in for the lost Yurchenko 1.5s from Alexia Burch and Cammy Hall, joining Jaedyn Rucker, Grace McCallum, Lucy Stanhope, and Maile O’Keefe from last year’s final lineup to keep the scoring on track with 2022. And that may very well be what we see. Makenna Smith’s Omelianchik was the best vault performed at the Red Rocks Preview and is a must for this lineup, and while Abby Brenner’s Y1.5 was in and out of the Michigan lineup in her final year there, Utah doesn’t have as many 10.0-start options and could really use a healthy Brenner on vault. 

As for the returning locks, the Jaedyn Rucker Y1.5 will likely anchor, Grace McCallum’s Servente should continue to be essential (though she performed only a Yurchenko full at the RRP), and Lucy Stanhope’s Y1.5 earned Utah’s best vault NQS last season thanks to its consistent landing. They should all be back.

In terms of Operation All 10.0s, it sounds like Utah is hoping to get a Yurchenko 1.5 out of Sage Thompson this year as the 6th vault, but if not, there is a comfortable supply of fulls from the likes of Thompson, Hoffman, O’Keefe, Sabado, and now Jaylene Gilstrap as well, who has not vaulted for Utah but showed a very realistic full with good distance at the preview. Having one full in the final lineup probably won’t be the ideal plan if Utah has winning aspirations, but it wouldn’t be the end of the world.

BARS

2022 Event Ranking: 6

Lineup locks: Maile O’Keefe, Cristal Isa, Grace McCallum, Sage Thompson, Abby Brenner
Lineup options: Amelie Morgan, Makenna Smith, Abby Paulson, Alani Sabado, Kara Eaker, Jaedyn Rucker, Lucy Stanhope

Utah brings back its entire championship lineup on bars this year, so the option exists to just keep everyone the same. Yet, this is probably the event with the most potential for upgrade enhancements, so Utah won’t actually want to keep this one exactly the same. The first bit of news per faithful Utah gymnastics reporter Trent is that Cristal Isa’s injury that kept her out of the Red Rocks Preview is not considered season-threatening (and certainly did not curtail her sideline dancing contributions), so we can go ahead and put her in lineups for the purposes of this preview. Isa should once again be considered a lock for this bars lineup, along with O’Keefe, McCallum, and Thompson. Four big scores, no reason to change anything there. Amelie Morgan also seems solid to return to the leadoff position, and the toe tuck 1/2 dismount looks like a stickable option for her thus far. 

Abby Brenner had an NQS over 9.9 last year, so Utah’s path toward upgrading the bars scores likely has her slot into the lineup in place of Abby Paulson, who is typically in the 9.800-9.850 zone for her routine. This year’s best lineup probably has Paulson as the reliable backup. The best lineup may also end up including Makenna Smith, who has a lovely Maloney to Pak to start her routine and whose presence in the six may hinge on the consistency of that double Arabian dismount. Alani Sabado also has a pretty bars option but is usually in backup zone here. 

BEAM

2022 Event Ranking: 1

Lineup locks: Kara Eaker, Maile O’Keefe, Abby Paulson, Cristal Isa
Lineup options: Grace McCallum, Amelie Morgan, Jaylene Gilstrap, Lucy Stanhope, Makenna Smith

Utah’s beam was best in the country last season and returns all six athletes from that lineup (since Adrienne Randall didn’t end up in the championship beam lineup), so there’s really the least to say here. In this case, Utah would have exactly zero problems with keeping that Eaker, O’Keefe, Paulson, Isa, McCallum, Morgan group exactly the same. Without Randall and Alexia Burch on the team this year, there are actually fewer great beam workers you need to try to cram into a lineup and therefore less angst about what the actual best six should be. It’s pretty much…this. Grace McCallum’s place was touch-and-go at times last year, but she was in the nationals lineup, and Utah’s best-scoring beam team would have her in it.

In place of Isa, Jaylene Gilstrap performed a lovely routine at the RRP that is a very viable option as well, at least for inevitable resting and injury replacement needs—if not for the final lineup. Lucy Stanhope was relegated to backup last season after making the lineup in 2021, and that’s probably the case again this year, while first-year Makenna Smith presents a possibility as well. Because of split positions, beam seems the least likely lineup for Smith to make in her first year, but she’s in the picture.

FLOOR

2022 Event Ranking: 4

Lineup locks: Grace McCallum, Jaedyn Rucker, Maile O’Keefe, Abby Paulson
Lineup options: Abby Brenner, Makenna Smith, Kara Eaker, Jaylene Gilstrap, Jillian Hoffman, Lucy Stanhope, Sage Thompson

The single biggest replacement question on any event for Utah this season is the Sydney Soloski floor anchor 9.950 and where that might come from now—since there isn’t really the huge floor star joining the team who would obviously make up for it—but there shouldn’t be any lack of reasonably scoring options.

Utah will certainly have Grace McCallum, Jaedyn Rucker, and Maile O’Keefe returning with presumably the top 3 scores in the lineup, and Abby Paulson once again should feature after appearing on floor in nearly every meet last season. As on vault, the simplest solution may be to have Abby Brenner and Makenna Smith come in and join a first-choice returning four. Brenner’s NQS of 9.895 on floor last season would put her at 4th-best on this year’s Utah team, and Smith is a clean twister with a front 2/1 (she also has a double Arabian in her pocket from L10) who looks like she would fit into a six nicely.

In terms of potential game-changing wildcards, remember that time Jillian Hoffman got 9.975 on floor last year before her injury? That. There’s also Kara Eaker if she’s able to get into the lineup at all regularly this time, though that 1.5 combo pass attempt at the RRP had us all saying, “Just save yourself for beam.” 

Ideally, we’d see Gilstrap in this lineup because of how gymnastics is supposed to look, but she’s more typically in the 9.8s, so it’s not a given. The same is true for Stanhope who has the difficulty in her corner but has tended to get knocked to backup position in this lineup.

2023 Preseason Coaches Poll

2023 Preseason Coaches Poll
1. Oklahoma (22 first-place votes) – 1727 points
2. Florida (21 first-place votes) – 1724 points
3. Utah (2 first-place votes) – 1648 points
4. Michigan (4 first-place votes) – 1600 points
5. Auburn – 1509 points
6. LSU – 1434 points
7. Alabama – 1395 points
8. California – 1325 points
9. Missouri – 1262 points
10. UCLA – 1242 points
11. Kentucky – 1154 points
12. Michigan State – 1129 points
13. Denver – 1119 points
14. Oregon State – 1066 points
15. Arkansas – 1043 points
16. Minnesota – 1042 points
17. Stanford – 1007 points
18. Iowa – 952 points
19. Ohio State – 844 points
20. Georgia – 794 points
21. Washington – 768 points
22. BYU – 674 points
22. Illinois – 674 points
24. Arizona State – 583 points
25. Arizona – 548 points

Honestly, this is one of the least insane coaches polls of recent memory, which is really hurtful to me and my whole deal. Where is the random first-place vote for Centenary? Where is the BS legacy ranking? Who even understands the point of this anymore?

Defending champion Oklahoma takes the top spot in this season’s poll, which is not particularly surprising given the history of the defending champion usually (but definitely not always) getting the #1 spot in the next year’s poll—combined with the general idea that Oklahoma should get even better this year with two new elite AAers joining 22 of 24 returning routines from the national championship. Last year was supposed to be Oklahoma’s beatable year, and no one beatable-d.

The interesting thing is that Oklahoma is essentially in a tie with Florida, which one might decide to attribute to the power of the SEC cabal looking out for its own, or to the power of the “Florida you have a million perfect gymnasts on this team, how are you not winning every time.” Either/or.  

Utah’s #3 position here mimics the finish from last season, and Michigan slots in at #4, just ahead of last season’s finalist Auburn, which more reflects the overall performance during the season and what probably would have happened had Michigan not melted down on bars and beam in the national semifinal. Michigan’s 4 first-place votes placing below Utah’s 2 first-place votes likely tells us that Utah was a more unanimous top-4 selection, while for Michigan, some people voted for a team that was in the top 3 all of last year, and some people copied their homework from RTN’s final standings. That’s the opposite of what usually happens with Utah. Utah typically gets a chunk of first-place votes and a chunk of like…zeroes…for a middling result.

We do see some actual awareness of what has transpired since the end of last season with the placement of Minnesota. Minnesota finished 6th last season but has famously lost Loper and Ramler and is now ranked 16th in the preseason poll. Such a drop from last season’s result is rare, but I would have done the same thing. We see the opposite phenomenon in the case of LSU, which didn’t really pay any poll price for missing nationals last year and received the #6 position here, about where LSU sat during the entirety of the regular season. 

UCLA comes in at 10th in the preseason poll, which is better than last season’s finish but still UCLA’s lowest preseason ranking since we’ve been doing this. The talent on this team is a lot better than 10th in the country, but after the results of the last two seasons, there hasn’t really been a lot of earning a high ranking. On that note, let’s talk about Georgia, where we also see an all-time low preseason ranking of #20 but also some evidence of reputation and historical deference since Georgia not only finished 30th last year but never once in the entire season ranked as high as 20th. Now, perhaps the coaches as a group are just really excited about JaFree Scott. I know I am. Or perhaps they saw the name Georgia. That’s between them and Olivia Colman.

On the other side of that coin, we have the upstarts and surprise finishes from last season. Missouri is up 7 spots relative to its preseason placement in 2022, while Stanford is up 16 spots, and Michigan State is up 24. All of those teams still rank below their ultimate 2022 finishes in this poll, so they’re not getting full credit for their results last season, but there’s some awareness of them.

Weird thing: There were way, way fewer respondents this year compared to last year. Last season, 69 ballots were submitted for the preseason poll, while this season we have 49 ballots. Not that many. BUT COME ON THIS MATTERSSSSS.

2023 Big 12 and MRGC Depth Charts & Roster Moves

Check out the previous depth charts from the SEC, Pac-12, and Big Ten.

[wptb id=95684]
LOSTGAINED
Carly Woodard – BB, FXFaith Torrez
Karrie Thomas – UB (BB)Ava Siegfeldt
Vanessa Deniz – (UB, BB, FX)Caitlin Smith (JAN)
Emma LaPinta – (FX)
Moorea Linker – (VT, UB, FX)

Oklahoma returns 22 of the 24 lineup routines that won the national championship last April, with just the beam and floor routines from Carly Woodard departing, which sets the Sooners up very well for the 2023 season. Elites Faith Torrez and Ava Siegfeldt are both realistic 4-eventers (they may not make all four, but they’ll be in the mix), which should serve to increase Oklahoma’s depth of competition-level routines on each event.


[wptb id=95703]
LOSTGAINED
Emily Glynn – VT, UB, FXMila Brusch
Mia Sundstrom – VT, UB (BB, FX)Ava Mabanta
Emma Brown – (BB, FX)Kylie Rorich
Cecilia Cooley

The most important development for Denver is, of course, having Lynnzee Brown back for a 6th season. She provides the best opportunity to upgrade the final lineups from last season on every event—and since Brown, Glynn, and Sundstrom were all injured by the end of the season, Denver does return every routine that competed in the regional final so will look to go only up from there. Expect several first years to crack lineups as well, and just generally bolster the depth across the apparatuses (with more gymnasts coming in than leaving this year).  


[wptb id=95723]
LOSTGAINED
Andrea Maldonado – FXLauren Thomas
Sophia Steinmeyer – VT, BB (FX)Madison Matassa
Meixi Semple – BBMadelyn Manternach
Ariana Orrego – VT, UB, FX (BB)Reagan Loftis
Ana Palacios – UB (BB)Morgan Engels
Jade Vella-Wright – (UB)Samantha Rose
Phoebe Turner – (VT, BB, FX)
Adnerys De Jesus – (VT, UB, BB, FX)
Maddie Crosse

It’s going to be a project this season for Iowa State because the team has graduated 7 of the 24 routines from regionals last year (along with a number of other athletes who would have been in lineups in an ideal world in 2022) without big stars coming in to replace those lost numbers. This is, however, a large roster made up predominantly of specialist contributors who have mixed and matched to fill gaps in the past, and Iowa State will also rely on some injury returns from 5th years who were not available last season but would surely have been in the lineup.


[wptb id=95731]
LOSTGAINED
Rachel Hornung – VT, UB, BB, FXMiranda Smith
Esperanza Abarca – UB (BB)Emma Wehry
Lauren SoltisCarlee Nelson
Nicole NorrisBrooke Irwin
Kaia Bochow
Olivia Pitzer
Ellie Sigman

West Virginia has lost a critical athlete in Rachel Hornung, who was vital in the all-around last season (as well as bars specialist Abarca), though the team does not face an unearthly number of routines to replace. Kendra Combs returns for an extra year, and we should get to know several of the faces in this large first-year class of reinforcements. Before missing 2022, Miranda Smith won floor at L10 Nationals in 2021, also finishing 3rd on vault which should provide an opportunity to upgrade WVU’s weak event from last year.


[wptb id=95720]
LOSTGAINED
Rebecca Wells – VT, UB, BB, FXMarley Peterson
Brie Clark – VT, BB, FXAvery Bibbey
Eve Jackson – VT, UB, FXChelsea Southam
Trinity Brown – VT, FXJenna Eagles
Molly Arnold – VT, FX (UB)Payton Gatzlaff
Kielyn McCright – BB
Anique Grenier

It’s going to be a project (and a multi-year process) for Utah State given just how many athletes elected to go with Amy Smith to Clemson, amounting to 15 of the 24 routines from 2022 regionals no longer with the team. With a small group of incoming athletes, along with a couple transfers, putting together complete lineups will hinge on getting routines from returning athletes on events they have not competed in a while, or where they were not making lineups in the past.  


[wptb id=95721]
LOSTGAINED
Sadie Miner Van Tassell – VT, UB, BB, FXKylie Eaquinto
Haley Pitou – VT, UB (BB)Madison Raesly-Patton
Brittney Vitkauskas – FXKauri Hunsaker
Abby Beeston – UB, FX (BB)Jayda Lealaogata
Sophia McClelland – BBEmily Wisehart
Lexi Griffith – VTElaina Greco
Adeline Rieder – FXMorgan Trevor
Rachel Bain Heaton – (VT, FX)

BYU is also entering a season of major transition (though not quite as extreme as Utah State), with exactly half of the routines from last year’s regionals lineup no longer on the team. There’s a lot of work to do to replace last year’s results, especially since BYU won’t have been completely content with that 24th-place finish anyway, their lowest since 2017. BYU should, however, have a hearty bunch of real-life routines coming in from the first-year class, where Kylie Eaquinto is expected to be a headliner-level new performer.


[wptb id=95725]
LOSTGAINED
Hope Masiado – VT, BB, FX (UB)Kylee Hamby
Emily Muhlenhaupt – UB (BB)Sydney Kho
Maddi Nilson – VT, UBBrantley Lucas
Samantha Smith – VT (FX)Riley Shaffer
Alexis Stokes – UB, BBSarah Coghlan
Tessa OtuafiSydney Leitch
Anna Ferguson

Boise State typically manages with a small roster, so it’s noteworthy to see such a large first-year class here. That’s going to be essential since only 9 gymnasts who competed last year return to the team, including just 3 gymnasts who have ever done bars before and 4 who have ever done vault. So while the loss of 9 routines from the regionals lineup last year is not the same girth of loss as Utah State or BYU have, the significance is similar, as will be the expectations placed on the new athletes.


[wptb id=95726]
LOSTGAINED
Hannah Nipp – UB, BB, FXTrista Goodman
Stephanie Tervort – VT (UB)Olivia Orlando
Morgan Alfaro – VTKayla Pardue
Kayla Horton – FX (VT)Megan Locke
Emma Wissman – (BB)Kennadi McClain
Madeline Tyau – (BB)Ellie Thomson
Brianna Alcantar – (VT)Camry Miller
Katie OursAmelia Rieder
Madeline Amundson
Summer Horsley

While there are quite a few individuals missing from Southern Utah’s roster this season, SUU largely avoided the roster explosion befalling the other teams in the Mountain Rim conference by getting 5th seasons from five gymnasts, including perennial stars McClain and Murakami. Without those returns, we would be having a very different conversation right now. As it stands, Southern Utah will have to do without Hannah Nipp’s scores in 2023 but will largely view the routine-replacement project as manageable with this typically sizeable first-year class.

2023 Big Ten Depth Charts & Roster Moves

You can also check out the rundown of roster changes for the Pac-12 and SEC.

[wptb id=95693]
LOSTGAINED
Ona Loper – VT, UB, BB, FXSarah Moraw
Lexy Ramler – VT, UB, BB, FXBrooklyn Rowray
Hannah Willmarth – UBSeria Johnson
Haley Tyson – (BB)Megan Steensland
Erin Fortman
Alissa Fuelling
Olivia Reed

There’s no question that expectations will be…more muted for Minnesota this season after last year’s 6th-place finish given the departures of Loper and Ramler. The total loss from last year’s nationals lineup amounts to 9 routines, but they were the 9 most important non-Mya-Hooten routines on the team. There is some help on the way. Sarah Moraw was one of the top L10 gymnasts of the last couple years and has a Y1.5 on vault, and Brooklyn Rowray seems like one of those Chow’s execution diamonds who will break out on college. Still, Minnesota is also going to need several returners to compete more consistently on events where they have the talent but have been in and out of the lineups over the previous years because of injury or all-the-falls.


[wptb id=95696]
LOSTGAINED
Abby Brenner – VT, UB, FXKaylen Morgan
Lily Clapper
Farah Lipetz
Paige Thaxton

The big deal for Michigan this season is that both Natalie Wojcik and Abby Heiskell return for a fifth year, which means that the core of the team remains almost entirely intact. With Wojcik, Heiskell, Brooks, Wilson, and Morrison, there’s not a lot more that’s needed, even before factoring in a healthier group of returning gymnasts (Vides, for instance, was expected to be a big VT/FX contributor at least, Vore’s best L10 event was vault, and Bauman was important for the beam lineup before her injury). With this first-year class, there are many lineup-possible routines peppered among the group that may simply end up adding to the team’s improved depth this season before becoming more important next season, but Kaylen Morgan’s bars does look like a frontrunner to replace Brenner there.


[wptb id=95698]
LOSTGAINED
Lea Mitchell – UB, BB, FXNikki Smith
Ashley Hofelich – VT, FXOlivia Zsarmani
Alyssa Wiedeman – VT, BB (FX)Sage Kellerman
Sydney Ewing – FXElle Beaufait
Alaina Raybon – (UB)Stephanie Lebster
Tara Walsh

Somewhat similarly to Stanford in the Pac-12 roster preview, Michigan State is losing a fairly hefty number of critical routines from its major breakout season—but should also have the talent in this first-year class to make up for those losses if they’re ready from the get-go. Nikki Smith won her age session at nationals this year and is expected to compete the all-around on this team, and Zsarmani and Kellerman should both see plenty of lineups, all of which would combine to make up MSU’s best path to get those 9 routines back (or improve on them).


[wptb id=95705]
LOSTGAINED
Lauren Guerin – VT, FXHaley Tyson
Clair Kaji – BB, FX (UB)Ella Castellanos
Bridget Killian – VT, BB, FXGianna Masella
Alex Greenwald – UB, FX (VT)Karina Muñoz
Mackenzie Vance – BB (UB)Hanna Castillo
Allyson Steffensmeier – UBKaia Vanney
Carina Tolan – UBAvery Chambers
Allie Gilchrist – (BB, FX)Emily Erb
Caelen LansingBailey Libby
Kamryn Martinez

It’s going to be a deeply different Iowa this season. Many of the names we’ve come to know during Iowa’s rise to gymternet super-fan-dom are not on the team anymore, including half of the routines from last season’s regional final. It’s hard to see all of that replacement work coming from the first years, but Gianna Masella and Karina Muñoz should see a lot of time and Kaia Vanney could be one of those under-the-radar stars (and I’m not just saying that because her dad used to be all that and a bag of 90s). I’m also very interested to see what comes of Haley Tyson, who was supposed to be the next best thing to Lindsay Mable at Minnesota but barely saw competition last season and has now transferred to Iowa. 


[wptb id=95716]
LOSTGAINED
Lexi Powe – VTArielle Ward
Shaylah Scott – (VT, BB, FX)Alea Byrne
Ashley Resch – (VT)Tali Joelson
Katharine KlugmanEmma White
Mia Scott
Kiera Wai

Illinois drops very, very little from last season’s team. There’s a lineup vault from Lexi Powe, and while Shaylah Scott had previously been a major lineup contributor, she did not compete at all in 2022 as 23 of 24 of the regionals routines return. Illinois will hope to get a healthy season out of Makayla Green and contributions from first years Arielle Ward and Alea Byrne to step up the supply of options.


[wptb id=95717]
LOSTGAINED
Miriam Perez – (FX)Payton Harris
Sarah Rowland – (VT, FX)Kaylyn Mintz
Mallory Gregory

Ohio State has the absolute least to manage in terms of transition because all 24 of last season’s final-lineup routines return for 2023. There is only adding, no subtracting. And there will be some adding because all three first-year gymnasts should have at least one event where they break into the lineup to provide an upgrade over last season.


[wptb id=95727]
LOSTGAINED
Audrey Barber – VT, UB, BB, FXVictoria Gatzendorfer
Sanya Glauber – (UB, FX)Taylor Rech
Leksana Andrews – (BB)Maddie Komorski
Annie SlatoffMaia Lee
Shani Sirota

Maryland’s losses this season don’t involve a lot of people but they do involve a lot of significance with Audrey Barber’s team-leading routines on every event no longer there. There is no single newcomer who seems like she is going to come in and be the all-arounder, so it will have to be a group effort among the first years, Missouri transfer Victoria Gatzendorfer, and potentially Lindsay Bacheler returning from injury as Maryland tries to challenge for the next tier in the conference.


[wptb id=95801]
LOSTGAINED
Kynsee Roby – UB, BB (VT, FX)Sophia McClelland
Makayla Curtis – VT, BB, FXCsenge Bacskay
Anika Dujakovich – (VT, FX)Lauren Homecillo
Kaitlyn Higgins – BB, FX (VT)Emalee Frost
Joanne De Jesus-CortesKatelyn Barth
Caroline WilliamsAnnie Worley

The trouble for Nebraska is that this team has some significant routines to replace (7 of 24 from the conference championship) just to get back to last year’s level—and getting back to last year’s level won’t be considered good enough because last year they did not advance to regionals. By far the most (potentially) significant development here is the introduction of Hungarian elite Csenge Bacskay and whether that challenge cup content can be effectively adapted to an execution-heavy college code. There’s also the Era of Emma Spence to consider. She had a solid first season and has only improved during her prolific gymnastics journey since last NCAA season through Commonwealth Games and worlds.


[wptb id=95803]
LOSTGAINED
Lauren Bridgens – VT, UB, BB, FXGabbie Gallentine
Alissa Bonsall – VT, UB, FXAva Piedrahita
Melissa Astarita – FX (BB)Amani Herring
Kourtney Chinnery – VTHaleigh Gibble
Jessie Bastardi – (BB)Katie Leary
Dymiana Cox – BB
Natalie Cross – (VT, UB, BB)
Donna Howell – (VT)
Anastasia Frank

Penn State must contend with major losses from last season, the class that carried the team through the beginning of the post-Thompson era. At the same time, this is one of the more encouraging crops of new athletes that we’ve seen from PSU in quite as while as both Ava Piedrahita and Amani Herring are L10 standouts who could realistically combine to contribute 6-8 lineup routines, and Gallentine will be one of the more fascinating transfers of this NCAA season. Gallentine definitely brings a proven bars routine that Penn State could use, but she should also have other events that can make a Penn State lineup that simply weren’t up to Florida level.


[wptb id=95835]
LOSTGAINED
Belle Huang – VT, BB, FXRachael Riley
Mia Betancourt – VTNailah Adams
Abigail Karolewski – (UB)Valentina Lorente-Garcia
Jordyn DuffieldInnocent Mensah
Jenna FergusonGabrielle Dildy
Kylie HaffnerRenee Figueroa
Rees HaglerHarmony Webster
Jordan HalcomLainey Link
Sage LittlejohnEmma David
Kieran Ross
Anna Yeakel

The chart of roster changes for Rutgers is big this year, but this is a case where it could be a lot of different without a lot of change since nearly all of the people dropped from the roster this season were not contributing routines. The Belle Huang graduation is the main devastation that has to be dealt with. Between Canadian favorite Rachael Riley and top L10 recruit Nailah Adams, Rutgers has a path to bolstering most of its lineups this season. 

Because gymnastics is a comedy, not a drama